0
Yes, that is exactly true. Even if the tests reveal something else, they must be testable by many other scientists. There is a way to do this called the scientific method.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoYes
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Should scientific explanations be logical and testable?
Answer it for me.
What are the qualifications for a scientific explanation to be testable?
Scientific explanations are testable if confidence in the explanation could be undermined by a failure to observe the predicted outcome. One should be able to imagine outcomes that would disprove the explanation.
What does Explanation mean in science mean in science?
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Why is science is limited?
Science is limited by its reliance on direct observation and testable hypotheses. Due to this fact, science cannot make judgments about values, ethics, or morality. "Science can reveal how the world is, but not how it should be." (Castro & Huber, 2010)
Do you know anything about science?
The starting point for most science is simple observation, and attempting to find a logical reason for it. Consider Newton and his apple, or Archimedes and his bath. Folk such as de Bono tell us that before you analyse a problem completely, you should try and find five possible solutions or explanations. Then compare and contrast them and proceed to your analysis. Why do rivers flow downhill. Why are the clouds (mostly) well above the Earth. Why do we have a Moon.
Should scientific explanations be logical and testable?
Answer it for me.
What are the qualifications for a scientific explanation to be testable?
Scientific explanations are testable if confidence in the explanation could be undermined by a failure to observe the predicted outcome. One should be able to imagine outcomes that would disprove the explanation.
Is a theory a hypothesis that hasn't been proven true?
The question is stated incorrectly. It should ask: "Is theory a hypothesis that HAS been proven true?" (my emphasis) 1) A hypothesis in science is merely a conjecture put forth to provide a basis for further debate and to conceive research and experiments. It is a working guess, not an untested theory. 2) A theory is a comprehensive set of explanations for known phenomena. It must make testable predictions that can be confirmed or reputed. 3) When you make explanations without testable predictions, it is called philosophy. To sneer "That is just a theory" is to misunderstand just how much effort goes into producing a testable theory. ## So the answer is No.
Why should science be logical?
Science relies on logic to ensure that conclusions are based on evidence and reasoning rather than personal bias or emotion. Logical reasoning helps scientists make sense of complex data, draw valid conclusions, and build upon existing knowledge. By following logical principles, science can maintain its credibility and objectivity in understanding the natural world.
What is Scientific explanations?
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
What Scientific explanation?
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
What does Explanation mean in science mean in science?
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
What should you title your science experiment your testable question which heats up fastest pinewood aluminum or ceramic tile?
Analysis of heat transfer in basic building materials
Why is science is limited?
Science is limited by its reliance on direct observation and testable hypotheses. Due to this fact, science cannot make judgments about values, ethics, or morality. "Science can reveal how the world is, but not how it should be." (Castro & Huber, 2010)
What should a good science experiment involve?
A good science experiment involves a good subject of investigation, that is worth looking into, and a logical design that will produce meaningful results.
Do you know anything about science?
The starting point for most science is simple observation, and attempting to find a logical reason for it. Consider Newton and his apple, or Archimedes and his bath. Folk such as de Bono tell us that before you analyse a problem completely, you should try and find five possible solutions or explanations. Then compare and contrast them and proceed to your analysis. Why do rivers flow downhill. Why are the clouds (mostly) well above the Earth. Why do we have a Moon.
Can an interest in science be cultivated?
Science is interesting, therefore, if you learn about it, you should be interested by it. Only people who have failed to understand science, usually as a result of a haphazard approach that did not prepare them to understand material in a logical sequence, will then be uninterested in the subject.
