Yes it should be because it's healthy for you.
it makes the kids feel embarrassed and there parents should be teaching them, not science teachers
Yes, Wisconsin law prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in the areas of employment, housing, public education, credit and public accommodation.
In any sexual education, sex should be given right place and value and not overrated. This helps in maintaining balance.
Probably not the State Board - altho you should be able to bring suit against the teacher and the local school administration.
Yes, effective January 1, 2008, Oregon prohibits discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodation, public education and foster parenting on the bases of sexual orientation and gender identity.
Elizabeth J. Meyer has written: 'Gender and sexual diversity in schools' -- subject(s): Sex differences in education, School environment, Sex discrimination in education
Teenage pregnancy should be studied for a multitude of reasons. One of the main reasons is to determine how many are in need of sexual education.
Sexual education for example puberty etc.
As a general rule, banning consensual sexual activity between adults is not a productive or ethical approach. Instead, promoting education on safe and responsible sexual behavior, consent, and communication is key to ensuring healthy and respectful relationships. It is important to address issues such as sexual violence and exploitation through education, prevention, and support services.
Some people have a fetish for sexual activities in public.
The truth is that accepting ALL law-abiding people should be taught in school, regardless of the person's sexual identity or orientation.Religion should play no role in who is accepted in society and who isn't.
Yes, discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation and gender identity is explicitly prohibit in Vermont in the areas of employment, public accommodations, education, housing, credit, insurance and union practices.