yes it should. all the IMF and WB do is cause 'confusion and delay', not to mention all of the countries that they have put to ruin, and poverty.
The decision to abolish the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank is subjective and depends on one's perspective. While some critics argue that these institutions perpetuate global economic inequality and impose neoliberal policies on developing countries, supporters point out that they also provide financial assistance and promote economic stability worldwide. Instead of abolishing them, reforming these organizations to address their weaknesses may be a more practical approach.
Yes they should. All the IMF and WB do is cause poverty around the world, and ruin countries. A simplesolutionto world poverty is simple: abolish the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.William R.NCFCAdebtorpeoples:)
International Monetary System
European Union
Yes, it should be abolished all over the world including the Islamic Countries.
To promote economic development
World Bank and the International Monetary Fund
The International Monetary Fund was first established to help in the reconstruction of the payment system after World War II. Its function is to help with economic and global growth.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an organization of 187 countries, working to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an organization of 187 countries, working to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world
Both fight poverty in developing nations.
Home work should be abolished as they create a burden on the growing children and stops them to inherit the world and reach their limits
true