Should the Philippine Government be changed to parliamentary form?
The fact that we now have a hung parliamentary government, should make for some interesting and lively debates.
yes
maybe amended but not be replaced, as we are not changing the form of government
Israel operates under a parliamentary system as a democratic country with universal suffrage.
From the very start there were two thoughts of how government should be and these developed into political parties. Through the years they have changed names, and changed ideas about government.
T. C. Mossom Meekins has written: 'Parliamentary reform, should the colonies be represented?' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Colonies, Administration, Representative government and representation
Government receives its power from the people and should be changed if it does not ensure their safety and happiness.
Government receives its power from the people and should be changed if it does not ensure their safety and happiness.
Government receives its power from the people and should be changed if it does not ensure their safety and happiness.
In a parliamentary system, the Prime Minister is asked to form a government by the head of state (President or constitutional monarch) normally based on the results of the parliamentary election. The political parties normally try to avoid the head of states embarrassment by agreeing in advance which party or coalition should form the government.
The Philippine National Anthem should be sang as a MARCH, and is on a 4/4 beat.
It means that with thought toward the future, a government should not be changed for causes that aren't significant.