0
Should the US Supreme Court should be the final arbiter of the meaning of the Constitution?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
In a way whatever body makes the final interpretation of the Constitution is the Supreme Court - that is what the term implies. That is mostly what the Supreme Court is designed to do.
One might argue that the way the Court is chosen should be different, but the current system seems to have worked well for more than 200 years- I am not inclined to change it at this time.
Further, the Constitution can be changed without the Court's approval, so Supreme Court rulings are not truly final. For example, the Court once ruled that slavery could not outlawed by a state law.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Yes, the US Supreme Court should be the final arbiter of the meaning of the Constitution. As the highest court in the land, it is responsible for interpreting and applying the Constitution to legal disputes. Its role as the final authority ensures consistency in constitutional interpretation across the country and helps maintain the balance of power among the three branches of government.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
According to John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison who or what should interpret the Constitution?
Chief Justice John Marshall believed interpreting the Constitution was the responsibility of the Judicial branchof government. The Supreme Court of the United States is the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution.
Should the supreme court be guided by the original meaning?
The question of whether the Supreme Court should be guided by the original meaning of the Constitution is a matter of interpretation. Some argue that interpreting the Constitution according to its original meaning ensures fidelity to the intentions of the framers. Others argue that the Constitution must be adapted to address modern realities and should be interpreted flexibly. Ultimately, the approach to constitutional interpretation should strike a balance between respecting the original intent and allowing for societal evolution.
Should Congress have the power to interpret the Constitution?
The Supreme Court which is part of Judicial Branch
What is one way that congress had clarified the meaning of the constitution?
Congress doesn't clarify the constitution. They make laws. It is the Supreme Court that uses the constitution to interpret laws. There are judges who believe in strict interpretation of the constitution and they try to follow the constitution written as the founding fathers meant it to be made. Then, there are those who believe that there should be a looser interpretation because 200 years ago there was a different world than today.
Which part of the government according to the constitution according to the constitution should be made up of two representatives per state?
The Senate
Which authority should an Indian citizen approach for securing his fundamental right of personal freedom guaranteed by the Constitution?
supreme court
Supreme Court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to which question?
How important is the original intent of the Constitution when deciding cases? -Apex
What influences Justices when they decide a case and give their answer?
US Supreme Court Justices should only compare the case in the light of the US Constitution.
Do courts make the final determination on issues involving constitutional interpretation?
Yes, the courts interpret the Constitution. The Supreme Court of the United States, specifically, makes the final determination about how the Constitution should be interpreted.
The number of justices on the Supreme Court are fixed by?
Congress decides how many justices should be on the US Supreme Court. The current number, nine, was set by the Judiciary Act of 1869.
What is the supreme court's current position on the regulatory power of federal agencies?
'the supreme court should support article 1 of the constitution, but it doesn't.
Which laws are the Supreme Laws of the Land?
In 1793 the US Constitution became the supreme law of the USA. This was a change from the Articles of Confederation under which the former American colonies lived under. Even in the world of the late 18th century, the Framers of the Constitution understood that to survive in a world dominated by monarchs and their parliaments or other legislative bodies, the US needed to have a stronger Federal government to collect tariffs and call up armies for defense.
