That would be a bad decision seeing that we occupy and have military operations/in our allied (oversea) countries. The us military has operations in almost every country on the planet.
The decision to end overseas military operations should be based on a careful assessment of national security interests, global stability, and the potential impacts on allies and partners. While reducing military engagements might be desirable, completely ending overseas operations could potentially leave power vacuums that could be exploited by adversaries or destabilize regions. It is important to have a balanced approach that prioritizes diplomacy, alliances, and partnerships while ensuring national security.
That would be a bad decision seeing that we occupy and have military operations/in our allied (oversea) countries. The us military has operations in almost every country on the planet.
yes because it is costing our inocent soldiers' lives
True
Its costing us billions of dollars, its taking the lives of our men and women, and the operations are pointless.
No, the days of Imperial America had come to an end.
Decommissioned military trucks are often offered up as military surplus and available through auctions or scrapped for parts within the military. Sometimes, the equipment may have been important in certain military operations and may end up in historical museums or installation displays.
Operations Magazine ended in 2010.
Harvest Operations ended in 2009.
Special Operations Executive ended in 1946.
A railhead is either a point along a completed railway route that is located within a military "theater of operations" that is used to disperse supplies where needed, OR the end of an unfinished railway line. :)
All American troops, except for approximately 16,000 military advisors, withdrew from Vietnam on November 30, 1972 ending all combat operations.
Pan American World Airways ended its operations in 1991.