No
No, the government should not have the right to silence individuals who criticize it, as this undermines the principles of free speech and democracy. Open criticism is essential for accountability and transparency, allowing citizens to voice concerns and advocate for change. Silencing dissent can lead to authoritarianism and a lack of public trust in government institutions. Protecting free expression is crucial for a healthy and functioning society.
no beacause we have the right of the freedom of speech under the bill of rights. the government should be focused on other more important topics to deal with.
Should? Right there, you have created non-silence.
Legalism holds that principles should be followed because they originate from a terrestrial power whereas Confucianism holds that principles should be followed due to the sanctity of various types of personal relationships, extrinsic of any governmental bidding.In this way, a Legalist can never criticize a government because the government determines morality, but a Confucianist can criticize a government based on the preset requirements that a ruler-subject relationship must have.
What Should You Do - 2003 Breaking the Silence was released on: USA: 2003
i do not know but silence should be black because silent nights are pitch black
Yes.
"Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you are a mile away from them and you have their shoes."~ Jack Handey
Certainly. The right to criticize is a fundamental requirement for freedom. Final decisions on foreign policy are made by the Senate after due discussion.
Grave yards and memorials of the dead.
The sentence "Silence disappears when you say it," exclaimed Wilma should have a comma before "exclaimed" and the first letter of "exclaimed" should be lowercase.
Thoreau might argue that government should be limited and only involved in matters that protect individual liberties. He might criticize the overreach of government control and advocate for a more decentralized governing system. Thoreau would likely emphasize the importance of personal responsibility and self-reliance over reliance on government intervention.