You should use did.
I used the past tense to answer this question.
You should use the word had because if its past you would say i had this not I have this because it is not the past but the persent.
You can use should in past tense to say;Should haveShould not have (shouldn't)
First of all, the question should be: "Should you use the past or present tense after 'never'?"The answer is: you can use any tense after 'never'. It depends on what time frame to which you are referring.
we should use had if the sentence is in past tence
Your question is unclear. Is this a headline? Or are you trying to create a sentence?If this is a headline (for example, in a newspaper), then may I suggest the following:Election-filing deadline has passedYou should not use "past"; you need to use "passed". And you should use a hyphen for a compound modifier such as "election-filing".
If it is in the past.
The question you should ask is has your husband changed, if so, his past does not matter, all that matters is the present. If his past is still part of his present then you should judge it.
No. This question is a past simple question. In past simple question the verb is actually in present/base form. It is the 'did' that shows us the question is a past question. Why did you play with me - is correct
The Past Perfect of SIT is HAD SAT; but that question/invitation cannot use a Past Perfect.
"Had gone" is the correct form to use. "Went" is the past tense of go, but when forming the past perfect tense, you should use "had gone."
Yes, you should use a past participle after the verb "have" to form the present perfect tense. For example: "I have eaten," "She has studied."