Both countries operate under a Caste System. The system in India was strict and prohibited other classes from interacting with each other while Chinaâ??s social system did not demonstrate a formal and strict social ladder.
the social structure is priest, warrior, farmers, slaves and servants
both had complex social hierarchies.
Kind of complicated and hard to describe. Ancient Israel's social structure consisted of several classes,each of which played a key role in it's growth and development.
by the influence of the mistakes the older generations made.
Both had complex social hierarchies.
Brahmins, they were India's priests and were seen as the highest varnas, or social divisions.
-Latin was the social structure for the ancient Athens people.
it is the "social pyramid" if ancient India I think.
India's social structure is traditionally organized into a hierarchy based on caste, with four main categories: Brahmins (priests/teachers), Kshatriyas (warriors), Vaishyas (merchants/farmers), and Shudras (laborers/servants). Below these four castes are Dalits, formerly known as "untouchables." This caste system, while officially abolished, still influences social interactions and opportunities in India.
they did not really have one
In ancient Songhai, the social structure was hierarchical, with the emperor at the top followed by nobles, scholars, and artisans. Below them were farmers and laborers, and at the bottom were slaves. Social status was largely determined by birth, occupation, and wealth.
Sure. Any group of people has a social structure. Your family has one, so does your school.
based on a person with a person
both had complex social hierarchies.
the untouchables had the least power in India's social structure
Kind of complicated and hard to describe. Ancient Israel's social structure consisted of several classes,each of which played a key role in it's growth and development.
Social structure is buildings and statues also communicating with people na dhaving sex in public areas.
The very top is the Ruler.