The south lost the civil war
the union was winning the civil war
the south lost the war...
yes
Attack the civilian infrastructure that supported the Confederate armies in the field.Scorched Earth Tactics. Burn the South until no resistance remained.
The south was winning in the East and the north was winning in the West.
then the south would have a greater chance of winning the civil war
U.S. Grant
If this is civil war related, the north won, not the south. And the north freed the slaves in the south.
Tactics are the small decisions that concern a battle. Strategy is the larger plan affecting a whole war or campaign. Bad tactics for the south were frontal attacks versus entrenched troops. I feel it is their strategies that failed them (outdated Napoleonic warfare in a modern age).
it was a fight :]
Octavian became sole ruler by winning the civil war against his rival Antony.Octavian became sole ruler by winning the civil war against his rival Antony.Octavian became sole ruler by winning the civil war against his rival Antony.Octavian became sole ruler by winning the civil war against his rival Antony.Octavian became sole ruler by winning the civil war against his rival Antony.Octavian became sole ruler by winning the civil war against his rival Antony.Octavian became sole ruler by winning the civil war against his rival Antony.Octavian became sole ruler by winning the civil war against his rival Antony.Octavian became sole ruler by winning the civil war against his rival Antony.
Military theorist Emil Schalk was a first hand observer of the US Civil War. In his publication called the Summary of the Art of War, he stated that offensive tactics and bayonet charges were effective in winning battles. As far as favoring offensive operations, Schalk was in agreement with Henri Jomini.