answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It would have taken scientists longer to discover protons. A+

User Avatar

Trever Windler

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Suppose Rutherford had not seen any alpha particles deflected back from the gold foil. How would this most likely have affected scientific understanding of the structure of an atom?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How would this most likely have affected scientific understanding of the structure of an atom?

It would have taken scientists longer to discover protons. -- Suppose Rutherford had not seen any alpha particles deflected back from the gold foil. How would this most likely affected scientific understanding of the structure of an atom?


Suppose Rutherford had not seen any alpha particles deflected back from the gold foil. How would this most likely have affected scientific understanding of the structure of an atom?

It would have taken scientists longer to discover protons. A+


What did Rutherford call the region that deflected the alpha particles?

Nucleus.


Who explained the behavior of positively charged particles being deflected from a metal foils as the nucleus?

ernest Rutherford


What is the main observation of the Rutherford's experiment?

Most of the particles went through the foil, but some were deflected


Who discovered the nucleus using his gold foil?

Rutherford by bombarding gold foil with positively charged particles and noting that some particles were widely deflected.


Who discovered the nucleus using his gold foil experiment?

Rutherford by bombarding gold foil with positively charged particles and noting that some particles were widely deflected.


What is the explanation for the scattering experiment of Rutherford?

Rutherford conducted an experiment in which Alpha particles were fired at a gold nucleus. Most of the particles passed through unaffected. However, some were deflected by a small amount whilst an even smaller number of the particles were deflected completely. This led to the conclusion that the atom has an extremely small, central, positively charged nucleus. As both the positive alpha particle and the positive nucleus repel each other by electrostatic forces. The fact that only a small amount of particles are deflected shows that the nucleus is only a tiny central part of the atom.


Why were few alpha particles deflected?

some of alpha particles were deflected through an angle of 90 degree


What evidence led Rutherford to conclude that an atom is mostly empty space?

The experimental evidence led Rutherford to conclude that an atom is mostly empty space because most of the particles weren't deflected off of the gold foil in his experiment.


Who said most of an atoms mass is in the nucleus in an atom?

Ernest Futher Ford


How is the Rutherford Experiment Done?

To do the Rutherford Experiment, you have to shoot alpha particles at gold foil to and see where the particles pass through and where they do not. This will give you a general idea of what Rutherford did to discover the nucleus of an atom. However, alpha particles are very hard to come upon, as they are the nucleus of Carbon. Rutherford knew that alpha particles are about 7000 times more massive than electrons and are positively charged and the charge is twice the magnitude of the charge of electrons.when Rutherford directed a beam of alpha particles at a thin gold foil,he found that almost all particles passed through it without deflecting.A very small were deflected at an angle, however, and a few actually bounded back toward the particle source.