democracy
This is a question where the specific form of monarchy is needed in order to give a useful answer. In an absolute monarchy, the citizens have no voice. In a constitutional monarchy where the governance function is in the hand of an elected congress, ordinary citizens have the power of the ballot, power of the purse, freedom of speech, and freedom of protest.
A one party system is not always democratic as all the leaders belong in the same party and may not be able to check the government. The Westminster system on the other hand allows for competitive politics and cooperation among several parties.
The Taliban started in 1994 when Pakistan gave them the Pakistan government. From there, they got out of hand and was eventually taken out of power when Pakistan decided to have a voting system and scheduled voting in Spring '05.
An oligarchy is a form of government where power is concentrated in the hands of a few individuals or a small group, typically the wealthy or influential. Representative democracy, on the other hand, is a form of government where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. In an oligarchy, power is held by a select few, while in a representative democracy, power is delegated to elected officials to represent the interests of the people.
A federal system of government divides power between a central authority and regional entities, allowing both levels to govern simultaneously over the same territory. In contrast, a unitary system centralizes power in a single national government, with little to no autonomy granted to local governments. A confederate system, on the other hand, consists of independent states that delegate limited powers to a central authority, often retaining significant sovereignty. This leads to a stronger emphasis on regional autonomy in confederations compared to the balanced power-sharing in federal systems.
Conservatives claim to distrust the power of the government. On the other hand they don't object to extensive government surveillance .
Conservatives claim to distrust the power of the government. On the other hand they don't object to extensive government surveillance .
Ah, my friend, in a limited government, the advantage is that there are clear boundaries on the power of the government, which can protect individual rights. However, the disadvantage is that it may struggle to respond quickly to crises due to these limitations. On the other hand, in an unlimited government, the advantage is the ability to act swiftly, but the disadvantage is the risk of infringing on the rights of its citizens. Remember, every system has its strengths and weaknesses, like every brushstroke in a painting.
The main way that people participate in government is by voting. Other ways to be active in government is by lobbying, petitioning, and participating in boycotts and protests.(I'm not saying that you should go out and protest, but if you feel strongly about an issue, it is within your power to do so, so long as it does not grow out of hand.)by voting or registering to vote and participating in parties, jury duty, or voting in elections.
to overthrow the provisional government and hand power to the proleteriat, hence, estabish socialism.
The Roman Republic was a form of government in ancient Rome where elected officials represented the people and made decisions on their behalf. Canadian democracy, on the other hand, is a modern system where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf in a parliamentary system. The key difference lies in the time period, structure of government, and societal norms that shaped each system.
created a strong national government(arguments for) Article of federalist was against because they believe to much power in the hand of big government.