answersLogoWhite

0

Corroboration is the ability to compare information provided by two separate sources and find similarities between them. ... Finding corroboration between sources strengthens your conclusions, especially when you are making a historical argument.

User Avatar

Cheryl Beard

Lvl 10
4y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What does the historical skill of corroboration involve?

Making sure a conclusion is accurate by checking several sources.


What are the four elements of historical thinking?

The four elements of historical thinking are sourcing, corroboration, contextualization, and close reading. Sourcing involves analyzing the origin of historical documents, while corroboration involves comparing multiple sources to validate information. Contextualization refers to understanding historical events within their broader context, and close reading involves interpreting sources in depth.


Which are both techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?

Historians use corroboration, which involves cross-referencing multiple sources to confirm the accuracy of information, and contextualization, which involves placing evidence within its historical context to better understand its meaning and significance.


What are the 3 thinking skills historians can divide into 3 main processes?

Historians typically divide their thinking skills into three main processes: sourcing, contextualization, and corroboration. Sourcing involves evaluating the credibility and perspective of a historical document or artifact. Contextualization places the source within its broader historical framework, considering the social, political, and cultural factors of the time. Corroboration compares multiple sources to identify patterns, agreements, or discrepancies, enhancing the understanding of historical events.


Which historical thinking skill is the historian using?

The historian is likely using the skill of sourcing, which involves examining the origin of information to determine its credibility and relevance to the historical narrative. By identifying the sources of historical information, historians can better evaluate the context and perspective from which the information is presented.


Which type of historical skill do you use to put things in the proper order?

The historical skill used to put events in proper order is chronology. Chronology involves arranging events in the sequence they occurred, helping to understand the relationship between events and their historical context. This skill is essential for analyzing cause and effect, as well as for constructing narratives that accurately reflect historical developments over time.


When was Corroboration - album - created?

Corroboration - album - was created in 2001.


What one of these best explains the historical skill of connecting?

The historical skill of connecting involves building relationships and making meaningful associations between people or ideas in order to create valuable networks or insights. It can help facilitate communication, collaboration, and success in various endeavors.


What historical skill uses cause and consequences?

The historical skill that involves analyzing cause and consequences is often referred to as "historical causation." This skill enables historians to understand the relationships between events, recognizing how certain actions or decisions lead to specific outcomes. By examining these connections, historians can better interpret the significance of events and their impact on society over time. This analytical approach is crucial for constructing coherent narratives and understanding the complexities of historical developments.


What is The historical method uses what six elements?

The historical method typically employs six key elements: sourcing, which involves examining the origins of a document; contextualization, placing the source within its historical framework; close reading, analyzing the content and language of the source; corroboration, comparing multiple sources for consistency and reliability; interpretation, deriving meaning and significance from the evidence; and finally, writing, which involves constructing a coherent narrative or argument based on the findings. These elements help historians critically evaluate and understand past events and perspectives.


Which best explains the historical skill of connecting the past and the present?

The historical skill of connecting the past and the present involves analyzing historical events, contexts, and trends to understand their relevance to contemporary issues. This connection allows historians and individuals to draw lessons from history, recognize patterns, and appreciate the continuity and change over time. By examining how past actions and decisions influence current circumstances, we gain insights that can inform present-day choices and policies. Ultimately, this skill fosters a deeper understanding of our identity and the complexities of societal development.


Why is historical thinking skill of interpretation important for historians?

The historical thinking skill of interpretation is important for historians because it allows them to analyze, evaluate, and draw conclusions from historical evidence. By interpreting the past, historians can uncover different perspectives, gain insights into why events occurred, and make sense of complex historical narratives. This skill is crucial for constructing accurate and meaningful historical interpretations.