rational
Not really.
Pablo Picasso is best known for his Cubist art.
All kinds of art. Mainly his cubist paintings.
Yes, Vicente Manansala was a renowned Filipino painter known for his contributions to the Cubist movement. His work "Ina at Anak" (Mother and Child) exemplifies his unique style, blending traditional Filipino themes with Cubist techniques. Manansala's use of geometric forms and vibrant colors captures the emotional depth of the maternal bond while showcasing his innovative approach to art.
Juan was a part of Cubism. Therefore the type of art he made was Cubist.
The father of the modern movement in art is often considered to be Pablo Picasso. Picasso played a significant role in shaping the Cubist movement, which revolutionized the art world in the early 20th century with its fragmented and abstract representations of reality. His innovative approach to art had a lasting impact on subsequent art movements and artists.
because they capture different view points at the same time.
No, he did not paint cubist art, but he inspired the cubists.
No. That's Pre grad art school period.
No, she was not. Most of her popular works have much in common with Art Deco style. In some of her works, though, one might find cubist influence in background details. Later on she had a surrealistic period.
They arent used by art critics and historians
Sometimes in art history, an artist's works can not be defined under a particular style. Such is the case for Picasso's Guernica where he used aspects of Cubism (this is particularly prominent in the horse's face), but the entire piece should not be described as Cubist. Because of the fragmented objects and dislocated features, the best way to describe this art style would be Cubist fragmentation. Best of luck!