Want this question answered?
If a hypothesis does not explain an observation, it is rejected. A hypothesis is basically just an educated guess, so it could be wrong, or right.
That's a bit of a nonsense question. The existence of life is consistent with *any* and *every* hypothesis that tries to explain the existence of life, scientific or not. The existence of life is the very thing that the hypothesis is trying to explain, so necessarily the hypothesis assumes it and must therefore be consistent with it. The same goes for the *kind* of life we find on Earth: since any scientific hypothesis must explain the life we find here, such a hypothesis must necessarily be consistent with the life we find.
Convergence of telecommunications
False
200 million years ago
a proposal intended to explain certain facts or observations the hypothesis helps create the experiment. you have to know what you want as an outcome so you can modify the experiment so it all works out.
Hypothesis? Hypothesis is a proposal intended to explain certain facts or observations
When you are using the scientific method, you would try to imagine a hypothesis which explains an observation, but you might not succeed. A hypothesis that does not explain an observation would be considered a failed hypothesis. You would then need to invent a different hypothesis.
so you have to put in did it help you explain your hypothesis
A hypothesis is a theory that attempts to explain a certain phenomenon.
give the compound nucleus hypothesis
Narrow over time. Straight out of the solutions book
If a hypothesis does not explain an observation, it is rejected. A hypothesis is basically just an educated guess, so it could be wrong, or right.
Then explain why it was wrong
to explain why the data support or reject the hypothesis
No To form a hypothesis is an attempt to explain something just by your own thought (could be anything, but typically an observation, phenomenon, or some other scientific problem). To be a "valid hypothesis" the hypothesis should be testable (typically through empiric investigation) ... and it probably shouldn't sound outright absurd (from a scientific POW) ... depends. ... hope that helps.
A good hypothesis is determined by: Use of what you learned and what you know to infer the happenings. Also, if you have good reason to your inferences. Try to put at least 3 or 4 good reasons in. If the reasons make sense, and they are possibly correct, or close to it, you should have a pretty well built hypothesis.