0
The debate over the role of the Supreme Court in the interpretation of the Constitution was settled by the Judiciary Act of 1789?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
FALSE!
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoFalse :*
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was the debate over the role of the supreme court in the interpretation of the constitution settled by the judiciary act in 1789?
FALSE!
Questions about interpreting the constitution are finally settled by what court?
The Supreme Court settles questions about interpretation of the US Constitution.
Questions about interpreting the Constitution are finally settled by ______________.?
The Supreme Court
Disputes between states and the federal government were settled by?
The Constitution
Who considers the constitution to be a living document?
Everyone considers it a living document. It can be changed to fit the needs of the time through the amendment process and questions concerning constitutionality of laws are settled in the Supreme Court.
How were disputes settled while the constitution was being written?
Constitutional disputes were settled by debate and compromise.
What was the effect of the Supreme Court case Marbury v Madison?
The US Supreme Court set a standard on the power of judicial review. This meant, that the Court could review governmental actions without a lawsuit to be settled. The Court, on its own volition had the right to review issues that pertained to the US Constitution. In effect, the Court already had the ability or practice of " judicial review". It did not "gain it", it simply used the power the US Constitution gave to the Court.
Why is a colony not a state?
When the first Americans settled, they settled in colonies. When they proposed the US constitution, any colony that radified it became a state. Today, there are no colonies because they have all radified the constitution.
How is the Constitution designed to limit government power in order to protect individual rights?
Constitution has something called Bill of Rights which are your rights. Also, Supreme Court (Judicial branch) is there to interpret the laws. They can declare a law unconstitutional and all disputes between individual and government are settled in Supreme Court. Supreme Court's job basically is to protect people by following Constitution. History Freak The government envisioned by the Constitution is one of enumerated powers (see Art. I, Sec. 8 and the 10th Amendment). That means that unless the Constitution grants a power to the government, the government does not have that power. For that reason, many of the founding fathers did not believe that a Bill of Rights was necessary (the Bill of Rights was actually passed after the Constitution, at the insistence of several states). Since the founding and particularly since the Civil War the government's practical power has expanded tremendously through the interpretation of several clauses, e.g. the spending, commerce, and "necessary and proper" clauses. The Constitution also relies on the ideas of Separation of Powers and checks and balances to limit governmental power. MrAcademic
What was the effect of the Supreme Court case Marbury v Madison?
The US Supreme Court set a standard on the power of judicial review. This meant, that the Court could review governmental actions without a lawsuit to be settled. The Court, on its own volition had the right to review issues that pertained to the US Constitution. In effect, the Court already had the ability or practice of " judicial review". It did not "gain it", it simply used the power the US Constitution gave to the Court.
How are disputes over the powers of the states versus the power of the national government settled?
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court's power to decide what is constitutional?
The supreme court interprets the constitution and its findings apply to all states aswell as excutive and legislative acts. For example lets say Florida passed a law stating that african americans can not vote. People will feel that their constitutional rights have been violated and hire a lawyer to sue the state. The case goes straight to the supreme court for a hearing and the Judges hear both sides and figure out if in fact florida did violate the constitution. After the judges comfirm that the fifteen ammendment does protect the right to vote and constitution states that no state should deny the right to vote on gorunds of race the case goes in favor of the person suing the state. After this has been settled All states must adhere to the supreme court finding. In a simple way pretty much the court interprets the constitution and enforces it like congress can make a law that people feel is against the constitution and the supreme court agrees and says Nope that law is against the constitution therefor the law is nulled. This all has to do with the checks and balances which each branch checks and balances itself.
