The US Supreme Court set a standard on the power of judicial review. This meant, that the Court could review governmental actions without a lawsuit to be settled. The Court, on its own volition had the right to review issues that pertained to the US Constitution.
In effect, the Court already had the ability or practice of " judicial review". It did not "gain it", it simply used the power the US Constitution gave to the Court.
The Supreme Court gained the power of judicial review.
The effect of the landmark Supreme court decision in Marbury vs Madison helped in the separation of powers as far as the executive and legislature is concerned.
It gave the Court the ability to rule on whether laws violate the Constitution
The most important effect of Marbury v. Madison, (1803), is that it affirmed the Supreme Court's right of judicial review and set a precedent for future cases. Judicial review is the power of the Court to evaluate laws relevant to cases before the court to determine their constitutionality, and to nullify (overturn) any they find unconstitutional.In Marbury, the Supreme Court decided Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional because Congress had overreached its authority by granting the Court the right to issue all writs of mandamus, which contradicted the language of Article III of the Constitution.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
It gave the Supreme Court powers not given by the Constitution.
It gave the Supreme Court powers not granted by the Constitution
The Supreme court decision on Marbury version Madison by the federal judiciary. This is part of the court systems.
Dred Scoot v. Sanford
It gave the Supreme Court powers not granted by the Constitution
marbury vs. Madison
The Supreme Court's ability to declare the unconstitutionality of laws passed by the legislature was increased and the court's role as the interpreter of the law was solidified.
The Supreme Court gained the power to declare laws unconstitutional.