0
The decision to use atomic weapons to end World War 2 was made by President Harry S Truman even though he was aware of the high number of civilian casualties that Japan would suffer. What evidence off?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was Eisenhower gay?
There is no evidence whatsoever to believe that President Eisenhower was gay. He wasn't even gay in the original, and preferable, meaning of the word!
How many casualties occurred during world war 2?
Casualties after V-E DayThe exact numbers are hard to come by. I have read as high as 700. I don't know for sure. It took 7 years to eliminate all Nazi sympathizers. Here is more input:The final guerrilla resistance was not stamped out until 1948. They sniped, they planted bombs, and one of their favorite tricks was to stretch a rope across a road at the right height so that people riding in an open jeep would catch it in the neck. This could result in a broken neck or outright decapitation. The occupying forces executed guerillas when they caught them, the British used beheadings, and even resorted to taking and executing hostages.Here is recommended reading:"The Last Nazis: SS Werewolf Guerrilla Resistance in Europe, 1944-47" by Perry Biddiscombe; Stroud, Glouchestershire (Charleston, SC); Tempus Publishing, Ltd. 2000 ISBN: 0 7524 1793 2It will thoroughly cover the topic of Allied Occupation Troops after V-E Day.COMMENTIt's a strange thing, but Perry Biddiscombe's book is the only work that talks about 'Werewolf' guerrillas and it should be viewed very skeptically. There's no lack of American and British veterans who were in Germany in 1944-48. How many of them have mentioned areas that were dangerous because of Nazi guerrillas? On the contrary, most comment on how completely broken the German will to fight was. Biddescombe offers no evidence to support his assertion. Surely, were there such resistance, the places, dates, names of victims, etc. would be available. Lacking such supporting evidence, one is tempted to dismiss the claim as urban myth. There was indisputably criminal violence in the aftermath of WWII, and the US Constabulary in Germany did have casualties, but the last confirmed instance of organized resistance was in Aachen in March of 1945. It seems that the work includes incidents that took place during the war.It is widely suspected that talk of 'Werewolf' guellirras was 'talked up' by the Bush adminstration in order to try to explain insurgency in Iraq.
What did the Allied forces find in Germany?
Evidences of Nazi atrocities. Evidence of Nazi attempts at exterminating Jews. Evidence of Nazi attempts to create racial purity.
List five evidence to support U.S decision to declare war in ww1?
1- German submarine attacks on merchant and passenger ships carrying American citizens 2- Germany denounced it would resume unrestricted submarine warfare 3- Cultural ties between Americans and the Allies 4- The Zimmerman note in which the Germans promised that in return to Mexico's support, Germany would help them to reconquie the lost territory in New Mexico, Texas, and Arizona.
How do you justify your answer?
When you are given a question and you would like to make your point better the easiest way to do this is to PPE.Point,Evidence,Explain. When you are talking about your point the only way you make people believe it is if you show them evidence so the way if i wanted to show you that this method works then i would show you a essay with this method. But if you do not back this up with an explanation then this is useless. You must talk about the way that you evidence makes you point better so my evidence would make the point of this method being better because it got a high grade in the essay. Hope this helps allot. Cheers
What is substantive evidence?
documents or witnesses that can verify the evidence or evidence on which reliance can be placed for the decision of the case.
What rights does khalid sheikh mohammed have in the military tribunal?
Military tribunals are much different than federal courts. The accused does not have access to all the evidence against them; nor do they get to choose their attorneys. A military commission can use illegitimate evidence (obtained by illegal wiretapping, for example) but a civilian trial cannot. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has already been tried by military tribunal, and the decision has been made by the Obama Administration to try him by civilian trial in New York.
Who's decision is it to suppress evidence?
That would properly be the presiding judge's decision to make.
The final evaluator of forensic evidence is the?
The jury is the last to evaluate the evidence in their decision at the trial.
Who makes the final decision that the President is impeached?
When a US president is up for impeachment, the House of Representatives must decide if enough evidence has been gathered to proceed forward. If so, then a trial is held before the US Senate who will decide if they will impeach or not.
Decision made before hearing evidence?
Prejudicial
What has the author Michael D Rawlins written?
Michael D. Rawlins has written: 'Therapeutics, evidence and decision-making' -- subject(s): Clinical medicine, Therapeutics, Methods, Evidence-Based Medicine, Decision making, Evidence-based medicine, Decision Making, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Can i remove evidence using the children's act to procet me?
can a civilian remove what they think is drug evidence from a house stating the children's act states they can do this and it's not breaking the law
Is a valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning?
The valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning helps you come with an informed decision based on the evidence presented.
Which is a valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning?
The valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning helps you come with an informed decision based on the evidence presented.
What do you call a decision that you make after examining evidence?
In a court of law it's a verdict. In general use, it's an informed decision(?).
What do you think would happen if a president tried to avoid carrying out laws because he or she thought that the laws was unconstitutional?
First of all you would need to collect evidence and based on that the president should be presented in court for which ever law he broke. Then it is the judge's or the Jury's decision on how to handle the situation
