There is no one or final answer. It is a matter of porportionality. It is a matter of degree. Generally speaking though the end does not, in almost all cases, ever justify the means. This question must be answered one step at a time, each step of the way, to the final end. It cannot be bundled into allowing some evil along the way finally in the end leading to a final greater good.
I think it means that when you die you don't actually die because you go to either heaven or hell.
The end justifies the means.
No, "justified" and "groundless" are antonyms. "Justified" means having a valid or well-founded reason, while "groundless" means lacking a basis or foundation.
no
no
It means that through words or means, you can prove that your actions are justified. Such as, a policeman finds proof that a person stole a car, therefor the policeman is justified in putting the thief in jail.
Justified.
no,
The basic philosophical question here is does the end justify the means. That question is up to the individual person to decide.
since mercenary usually do what they do for money, it Wrong, money is the root of all evil. their doing it for the wrong reason. so the means doesn't justified the end
hindi ko alam
Such a Machiavellian question can only be decided on an individual basis. John Brown was not alone in advocating a more violent end to slavery, but many historians feel he's one of the most significant. Ultimately, as your question hinted at, the question becomes "Do the ends justify the means?" Was Lincoln justified in suspending Habeus Corpus? Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan? That may not be much help, but it's difficult to decide what is "justified."If you're interested in reading more about John Brown, I would recommend John Brown, Abolitionist by David Reynolds.
This means that do the characters have good legitimate reasons for their fears.