Monarchy.
There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.
The Etruscans ruled then, until the Roman Republic formed in 509 B.C.Later from the Roman Republic became the Roman Empire.To get your own opinion & more details on this,I would go to www.google.com and type in:"Who ruled Rome before 509 B.C. and how did they rule it?""How did the Roman Republic originally form?"or something specifically on the Etruscans... depending what you're looking for.This Website May Also Help:http://www.enotes.com/history-fact-finder/eras-their-highlights/what-government-ruled-rome-before-roman-empireGood Luck
No.
After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.
Little in history is known about the mysterious Etruscans who first developed this form of numeracy system and the Etruscans once ruled the Romans who in turn adapted this numeracy system with some modifications.
They didn't because it was the Etruscans who concieved this form of numeracy and they once ruled the Romans.
Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.
It was the Etruscans who first conceived this form of numeracy system and the Etruscans once ruled the Romans. Little is known in history about the mysterious Etruscans who once lived in the part of Italy that today is called Tuscany.
Rome was both an oligarchy and a democracy, yet at different times. First, Rome was ruled by kings, then an oligarchy. After that, the people threw out their kings and rich leaders to form a republic, the root of most modern government including the American government. After that, Rome was a dictatorship.
The Etruscans did not change Rome from a village to a city. Rome was a city form the beginning. Moreover, the fashionable theory that the Etruscans conquered Rome is just that, a theory. it has been challenged,.
It was an Etruscan because the Etruscans first conceived this form of numeracy and they once ruled the Romans.
It was the Etruscans who first conceived this system of numeracy and the Etruscans once ruled the Romans After the Romans gained their independence from the Etruscans they retained this form of numeracy which later became known as the Roman numeral system and was used throughout the Roman Empire