Increasing the concentration of the reactants will increase the rate of collisions, but will not change the fact that most of the time particles are in motion and not colliding.
This postulate is:" Atoms cannot be created, divided into smaller particles, nor destroyed in the chemical process. A chemical reaction simply changes the way atoms are grouped together".
This postulate is valid today only in some situations.
Answer: in fixed proportions
Parallel Postulate
Elements are formed from atoms.
Postulate #1: The force of attraction among molecules are negligible. Postulate #2: The molecules make elastic collisions. (kinetic energy concerved) Postulate #3: Despite contineous motion of molecules, the density remains constant.
Decreasing the temperature of the system will decrease the average velocities of the particles, but will not change their pattern of movement.
It seems odd to postulate that the planets/moons in our galaxy were the result of collisions. If that were true, why have we not been witnessing recurring collisions-- with the creation of other new planets/moons?
It seems odd to postulate that the planets/moons in our galaxy were the result of collisions. If that were true, why have we not been witnessing recurring collisions-- with the creation of other new planets/moons?
Could you please specify which postulate you are referring to?
midpoint postulate
Reflexive Postulate, or Identity Postulate.
Yes, it is a similarity postulate.
Side Angle Side postulate.
Yes, it is a similarity postulate.
first five postulate
When a postulate has been proven it becomes a theorem.