Yes. Although the Book of Judges records that there were a number of Judges who reigned together, most were operative at different times, with gaps of years in between.
When legislators appoint judges a person from which group is more likely to be selected by a member of the legal profession.
The question doesn't necessarily define what you're looking for, but I would say the best answer is that the prosecutor would argue for a "Consecutive Sentence".The two types of sentencing are "Consecutive" and "Concurrent".Assuming that the sentence for murder is 20 years (which is made up of course), a Consecutive sentence would mean that the defendant would serve 20 for each murder. So in the double homicide 20 + 20 = 40 years.In a Concurrent sentence, both sentences would be served concurrently, or at the same time, thus the sentence would only be 20 years (for the same double homicide).So, clearly, a prosecutor who wants the maximum time served would ask for a consecutive sentence.
The likely word is "choreography" (dance arrangement).
This is likely the word "constellation" (arrangement of stars).
If federal judges are elected, there can be less partisanship - if they are appointed, the politician appointing them will likely choose judges who agree with them politically.
If a person was deemed to have a higher level of attractiveness then they were more likely to get lower fines by Texas judges, so if people were believed to have a lower level of attractiveness they were more likely to get higher fines.
penalty APR - Plato Answer
internal arrangement of atoms
Highly likely. You don't have to actually have it on your person or in your hand to be in possession. If it was in YOUR car and you were anywhere near it, the law declares that are in "concurrent possession."
A president is more likely to appoint judges who would agree with him ideologically, and therefore, would be opposed by his ideological rivals in the Senate.
no, because you most likely have improved since then.
Liberal rulings (APEX)