No - the main goal of genetic engineering - is to eliminate weaknesses in the subject organism. Example 1 - Creating a strain of wheat that is resistant to disease
False A+ls - Awesomeness399 :P
No - the main goal of genetic engineering - is to eliminate weaknesses in the subject organism. Example 1 - Creating a strain of wheat that is resistant to disease False A+ls - Awesomeness399 :P
free boosie
Hybridization is crossing two varieties of the same or similar species through pollination or other natural methods to create a new variety. Genetic engineering is the process of artifically inserting a gene from one species into another species to create a new trait, such as inserting a bacteria gene into corn to create resistance to a pesticide. So, though some consider them to be the same, they are not. Hybridization is a completely different process than genetic engineering.
Sample answer: Engineered traits such as herbicide resistance could transfer to weeds and create "superweeds."
One drawback for genetic engineering is the fact that scientist don't know the long term consequences. Another disadvantage is the fact that some scientists could use the technology to create incurable diseases.
No - the main goal of genetic engineering - is to eliminate weaknesses in the subject organism. Example 1 - Creating a strain of wheat that is resistant to disease False A+ls - Awesomeness399 :P
Genetic engineering may enable scientists to create micro-organisms, animals and plants. These are commonly referred to as clones of the originals.
free boosie
Hybridization is crossing two varieties of the same or similar species through pollination or other natural methods to create a new variety. Genetic engineering is the process of artifically inserting a gene from one species into another species to create a new trait, such as inserting a bacteria gene into corn to create resistance to a pesticide. So, though some consider them to be the same, they are not. Hybridization is a completely different process than genetic engineering.
Not with current technology. What the future holds is hard to say for sure.
Science discovers natural phenomena that engineering can use to create the many technologies that we depend on every day.
DNA technology has allowed scientists to identify what specific genes do and insert those genes into other organisms to create a new trait in the organism it is inserted in.
When humans breed animals or plants, they are speeding up evolution to create organisms that are more useful to them. Also, genetic engineering could do the same thing (although I am strongly against genetic engineering and it would take me a long time to explain why). The long and the short of it is "Yes."
Sample answer: Engineered traits such as herbicide resistance could transfer to weeds and create "superweeds."
This is known as mutagenesis. This can be achieved in a number of ways, in either a controlled or random manner. Random mutagenesis can be achieved through exposure to UV light or free radicals such as hydrogen peroxide, which would create different mutations in each cell. Controlled mutagenesis can be performed to ensure that all organisms (single- or multi-celled) have the same genetic makeup. One method to modify DNA in a controlled manner involves the use of modified viruses.
One example of an activity with the suffix -eer is engineering. Engineering involves applying science and mathematics to design and create solutions to practical problems.
One drawback for genetic engineering is the fact that scientist don't know the long term consequences. Another disadvantage is the fact that some scientists could use the technology to create incurable diseases.