I know most people would answer, claiming that the Renaissance was rational and the Middle Ages dedicated to superstition. My own view, after studying this for a while, is that the Middle Ages were considerably less superstitious than the Renaissance. The bad witch hunts happened after the Middle Ages ended, as did Church attempts to suppress science. The Renaissance was really no more prolific in production of new inventions or science than the Middle Ages. The Renaissance also saw a decline in the rights of women and lower classes.
I have included a link below to an article on witch hunts, which illustrates the point pretty well, I think.
Kabbala (קבלה)
Witchcraft.
Cluniastes
Fresco's weren't done in the middle ages. I think you are thinking of Renaissance artist Michelangelo.
None. They were against magic. That's why they went after witches.
to help them multiplye
Jan Van Ruysbroeck has written: 'Vanden blinckenden steen' -- subject(s): Mysticism, Middle Ages
Israel Gollancz has written: 'Spenseriana' 'Allegory and mysticism in Shakespeare' -- subject(s): Allegory, Comedy, History, Jews in literature, Medievalism, Middle Ages in literature, Mysticism in literature, Shylock (Fictitious character) 'The sources of Hamlet' -- subject(s): Hamlet (Legendary character), Sources, Tragedy 'The middle ages in the lineage of English poetry' 'The Exeter book'
it was lost
The start of exploration ened the middle ages. New ideas, foods, and thinking came into Europe.
There was no "enlightenment" in the middle ages. The middle ages were a time of non learning, non growth, and very little was done towards any thinking other than beyond the daily wants and needs.
Lots of hard work, heavy lifting, and thinking.