Vaisyas
The commoners in Roman society were the proletariat. They were free men, but did not belong to either the patrician class, the plebeians class or the equite class.
there was three main classes formed Aztec society: the nobles, the intermediate class, and the commoners. Most people in Aztec society were in the third class, the commoners. By the way you spelled which wrong.....
It was the third estate which is also the commoners.
The plebeians were the working-class commoners of Rome, and the patricians were the rich noble class of Rome.
Conquered nobles
You should look in your text book...
The Aztec society was based on class and was organised like a pyramid. Slaves , commoners, middle class, nobles, Emperor. (in order from least powerful to most powerful)
The social class in Inca society that enjoyed more rights than commoners but fewer rights than nobles were the "kurakas." Kurakas were local leaders who acted as intermediaries between the commoners and the Inca nobility, overseeing administrative and judicial matters within their communities. They had privileges such as land ownership and exemptions from certain labor obligations, but did not hold the same elevated status as the noble class.
Lots of things divide Indian society gender,religion and class. Just like an other society in the world
How people are ranked in society..example...Peasants, Nobles, Etc. Ranks often go by wealth and education.
How people are ranked in society..example...Peasants, Nobles, Etc. Ranks often go by wealth and education.
Sumerian society was structured into three distinct levels: the ruling class, the commoners, and the slaves. The ruling class included priests and kings who held political and religious power. Commoners comprised farmers, artisans, and merchants who contributed to the economy and daily life. At the bottom were the slaves, often captured in war or indebted individuals, who had no rights and served the needs of their owners.