A plate :]
Dinner because it is the object of the verb "ate". Ate what? Ate dinner.
Ate is intransitive in that sentence. There is no direct object."You ate pizza in the cafeteria" is an example of ate as a transitive verb (pizza is the direct object).
Velociraptor ate meat. It was definitely a carnivore.
Steak is the direct object.
A verb with a direct object is a transitive verb. It requires an object to complete its meaning in a sentence. For example, in the sentence "I ate the apple," the verb "ate" is transitive, and "apple" is the direct object of the verb.
An 'object noun' is a noun that functions as the object of a verb or a preposition.Examples:The dog ate my homework. (the noun 'homework is the direct object of the verb 'ate')I gave the teacher flowers. (the noun 'teacher' is the indirect object of the verb 'gave'; the direct object is the noun 'flowers')The teacher gave me an A for effort. (the noun 'effort' is the object of the preposition 'for')
The direct object of the verb 'ate' is sandwich, a singular, common, concrete noun.The object of the preposition 'for' is lunch, a singular, common, abstract noun.
No. "The horse ate the apple." is a complete sentence.subject = horseverb = atedirect object = apple
Non. Something you ate is the culprit, definitely not airborne.
dinner
the adverb is rotten :D
Food is the direct object. This sentence does not have an indirect object. The D.O. answers the question "the dog ate what?" An indirect object would answer the question "for whom / to whom / for what?" as in "I gave the dog a bone." I gave what? A bone (D.O.) I gave the bone to whom? The dog (I.O.)