Want this question answered?
Eminent Domain is bad because it sometimes violates the fifth amendment with the assistance of courts and judges. People are supposed to be provided with just compensation for their homes. But they are usually not. The case of Kelo v. City of New London just proves this point even more. Eminent domain should not be used, unless it is for the improvement of bridges, tunnels, parks, schools or uses that are truly for use by the public and not private developers.
yes it can be good and badgood-- it improved technologybad- it started a bunch of wars and fighting
A good guy! In the Avengers that's what they were talking about how she changed and now she works on helping people to an extent.
To an extent, yes. Say eating fruit, it is good for you, but if you eat a tonne, it then turns into a bad thing. Excerise is another example of the extent, as you cna always over work yourself. The only thing that opposes this situation is contorled breathing.
To a certain extent. Too much of anything can harm you. HDL is considered the "good" cholesterol and LDL is considered "bad". Just watch what foods you put in your body and you should be good!
true a rhino is a bad animal and it gashed a guy called albert domain
The phrase "about as bad" functions as an adverbial phrase. It modifies the adjective "bad" to convey the degree or extent to which something is bad.
in real, pure distilled water is a bad conductor of electricity.but if the water contains some amount of salt then it conducts to some extent.
There are "good" and "bad" proteins and yes to some extent they are good for your body but too much can cause some problems. So a general amount from meat and dairy products is always healthy to eat small amounts of each.
No but some are and all people are secretly bad to some extent.
His weakness is fire, though the extent of how bad it effects him is questionable
good