0
True or false Conclusions related to historical events are limited to evaluating the existing evidence?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
True
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The remains of or indirect evidence of a pre existing organism is called a?
fossil
What is the meaning of Natural occurring solutions?
Existing by nature and no artificial aid..~Christine U~ :))
How do you add another porch light to an existing switch?
Piggyback off the box for the existing light. Run a wire from the existing junction box to a new junction box (which is placed wherever you want the new fixture). Then, in the existing box, connect the wire coming from the switch, the wire for the existing fixture, and the wire for the new fixture together using wire nuts. Wire up the new fixture, and presto, you have two fixtures on a switch where there was only one before.
What are the two types of obstacles?
existing and reinforcing
What rocks could have formed when bits of existing rock got stuck together?
Sedimentary rocks are formed when bits of existing rocks get stuck together
Conclusions related to historical events are limited to evaluating the existing evidence. True False?
True
Is it true conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?
true
Is it true that Conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?
true
How do historians support they're conclusions?
Historians support their conclusions by conducting thorough research, analyzing various historical sources, evaluating the reliability of each source, considering differing perspectives, and presenting their findings backed up with evidence. They also engage with the existing scholarship in the field to build upon or challenge established interpretations.
Assessing whether conclusions are warranted by the existing evidence best illustrates?
naturalistic observation
When conducting research for forming a hypothesis which practice should historians follow?
Historians should conduct thorough research by examining primary and secondary sources, analyzing existing historiography, and critically evaluating evidence before formulating a hypothesis. It is essential to consider the context in which historical events occurred and to approach the research with objectivity and openness to different interpretations.
Did Norse people wear horns on their helmets?
There is no historical evidence of it ever existing, but only a small amount of Viking Helmets have ever been found.
Why is much of history is still open to interpretation?
History is open to interpretation because it relies on analyzing and interpreting sources that are often incomplete, biased, or have different perspectives. Historians bring their own perspectives and biases to their interpretations, leading to differing conclusions. Additionally, new evidence or discoveries can challenge existing interpretations, leading to ongoing debate and revision of historical narratives.
Is evaluating existing programs important in a society with a large bureaucracy?
NO, bcuz gov't has no clue wat they are doing
Why do Christianity believe christ was sent to earth?
Because there is great historical evidence of a man (Jesus Christ) existing and there is much speculation because of his impacts and impressions earth whether he was 'the son of god'
When A historian using the historical thinking skill of examining historiography might?
When a historian examines historiography, they are evaluating how previous scholars have interpreted and written about a particular historical topic or event. By understanding the different perspectives and biases present in the existing literature, historians can gain insight into the evolution of historical understanding and identify gaps in the research that may warrant further investigation. This process helps historians contextualize their own work within the broader field of historical scholarship.
What is evidence based research and knowledge based research?
Evidence-based research is a method of scholarly inquiry that relies on empirical evidence to support conclusions and recommendations. Knowledge-based research, on the other hand, draws on existing knowledge and expertise in a particular field to generate new insights and theories. Both approaches are important for advancing understanding in various disciplines.
