A set of moving sections of lithosphere
an absence of fossil evidence
Because Katie beaver said so bitchhh
he theorized about the continental drift and he also said that a pangaea formed 200 million years ago
Because identical fossils were found on two continents far apart, it suggested that at one time the two landmasses were joined together. In other cases of lands separated by far less distance, plants did not propagate across the divide.
Can't log on .... but essentially I believe you are speaking of 'Plate Tectonics'. I'm sure Wikipedia should have a relatively comprehensive but understandable explanation.
plate tectonics
Plate tectonics, which refers to the concept of continental drift.
His evidence was incorrect.
Although it seemed to make a lot of sense, there was no known proof of HOW the continents would drift. It wasn't until years later that we gained knowledge of plate tectonics, which bolstered Wegener's hypothesis.
Alfred Wegeners 1912 theory of Plate tectonics and continental drift.
evidence supporting the idea of sea-floor spreading.
@ his time plate tectonics was not theorized. they didnt know yet that continental and oceanic crust are seperate. it was thought that continents were drifting on water and moved some million years ago due to erosion,etc! hence the "continental drift theory"
The evidence that supports wegeners hypothesis is the fossil evidence
Fossils support his hypothesis.
One day while scientists were exploring the sea floor, they discovered sea-floor spreading, thus proving Wegener's hypothesis to be correct.
yes it does.
The scientific means for proving his hypothesis had not yet been developed.