Because Katie beaver said so bitchhh
Wegner's hypothesis of continental drift was supported by evidence such as the jigsaw-like fit of continents, similarities in rock formations and geological structures across continents, and matching fossil evidence found on different continents. Additionally, the discovery of mid-ocean ridges and magnetic striping on the ocean floor provided further evidence for the movement of continents.
Wegener used the presence of the same fossil species on continents that are now widely separated as evidence for his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these fossils could only have come from animals that were able to move, ruling out the possibility of passive transport by ocean currents. This supported his idea that the continents were once connected and later drifted apart.
Because identical fossils were found on two continents far apart, it suggested that at one time the two landmasses were joined together. In other cases of lands separated by far less distance, plants did not propagate across the divide.
The presence of the fossil fern Glossopteris supported Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift. Glossopteris fossils were found on multiple continents that are now widely separated, indicating that these landmasses were once connected and later drifted apart.
Fossils found on separate continents that are now far apart provide evidence for continental drift. Similar fossil species found on continents that were once connected suggest that these landmasses were once united. Additionally, matching rock formations and paleoclimate evidence from fossils support the hypothesis of continental drift.
The hypothesis is supported by data from previous research studies, observational data, and controlled experiments. This data may include statistical analyses, graphs, tables, findings from literature reviews, and expert opinions. Additionally, the hypothesis may be supported by correlations, significant p-values, and reproducible results from multiple studies.
by all of the results he had after the tested his hypothesis
The hypothesis supported by evidence from the fossil record is that species have evolved over time through a process of natural selection, leading to the diversity of life we see today. This evidence comes from the ordered succession of fossils in sedimentary rock layers that show gradual changes in species characteristics over millions of years.
Wegner's hypothesis of continental drift was supported by evidence such as the jigsaw-like fit of continents, similarities in rock formations and geological structures across continents, and matching fossil evidence found on different continents. Additionally, the discovery of mid-ocean ridges and magnetic striping on the ocean floor provided further evidence for the movement of continents.
Wegener used the presence of the same fossil species on continents that are now widely separated as evidence for his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these fossils could only have come from animals that were able to move, ruling out the possibility of passive transport by ocean currents. This supported his idea that the continents were once connected and later drifted apart.
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
I know you have a textbook so use it
I know you have a textbook so use it
The presence of the fossil fern Glossopteris supported Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift. Glossopteris fossils were found on multiple continents that are now widely separated, indicating that these landmasses were once connected and later drifted apart.
Because identical fossils were found on two continents far apart, it suggested that at one time the two landmasses were joined together. In other cases of lands separated by far less distance, plants did not propagate across the divide.
Yes, fossil evidence such as similar plant and animal species found on separate continents has been used to support the continental drift hypothesis. The distribution of fossils across continents suggests that these land masses were once connected and later moved apart.
No, the claim that Lucy is a hoax is not supported by scientific evidence. Lucy, the fossil of a hominid species called Australopithecus afarensis, has been extensively studied and is widely accepted as a legitimate discovery in the field of paleoanthropology.