booglishullisj
Fossil evidence, particularly fossils of the same species found on different continents, provided initial support for the hypothesis of continental drift. Further evidence from the mapping of the seafloor, such as mid-ocean ridges and magnetic striping, led to the development of the theory of plate tectonics.
Yes, fossils and rocks support the hypothesis of continental drift. Matching plant and animal fossils found on different continents suggest they were once part of the same landmass. Rocks with similar ages and compositions found across continents also provide evidence for the movement of these landmasses over time.
Alfred Wegener used fossil evidence (matching plant and animal species across continents), geological evidence (similar rock formations and mountain ranges on different continents), climate evidence (glacial deposits and ancient climate patterns that suggested continents were once connected), and fit of continents (the way the continents seem to fit together like a puzzle) to support his hypothesis of continental drift.
Evidence supporting the hypothesis of continental drift includes the fit of continents like South America and Africa, matching geological features and rock formations across continents, and similar fossil records found on separate continents. Additionally, the presence of ancient glacial deposits and the alignment of mountain ranges between continents provide further support for the movement of continents over time.
Wegener's continental drift hypothesis was supported by several lines of evidence, including the fit of the continents, fossil correlations, and geological similarities across continents. For instance, the distribution of similar fossil species, such as Mesosaurus, found in both South America and Africa, suggested that these continents were once connected. Additionally, the alignment of mountain ranges and rock formations across continents indicated a shared geological history. These pieces of evidence collectively bolstered Wegener's argument for the movement of continents over time.
Fossils found on separate continents that are now far apart provide evidence for continental drift. Similar fossil species found on continents that were once connected suggest that these landmasses were once united. Additionally, matching rock formations and paleoclimate evidence from fossils support the hypothesis of continental drift.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Support for Wagner's hypothesis of continental drift includes evidence of fossil records, matching coastlines and geologic formations across continents, and the distribution of certain species that suggest connected landmasses in the past. These pieces of evidence helped bolster the idea that continents were once joined together and have since drifted apart.
The ratio of the price of tea in China to the average density of the Moon. Among other things. You might want to be more specific in questions like this.
It is any trace of an ancient organism that has been preserved in rock.Fossils provided evidence for continental drift by Wegener's hypothesis. Wegener studied land features, fossils, and evidence of climate change.
Fossil evidence, particularly fossils of the same species found on different continents, provided initial support for the hypothesis of continental drift. Further evidence from the mapping of the seafloor, such as mid-ocean ridges and magnetic striping, led to the development of the theory of plate tectonics.
Yes, fossils and rocks support the hypothesis of continental drift. Matching plant and animal fossils found on different continents suggest they were once part of the same landmass. Rocks with similar ages and compositions found across continents also provide evidence for the movement of these landmasses over time.
Fossil evidence showing similar plant and animal species in regions that are now widely separated provides support for Wegner's hypothesis of continental drift. This suggests that the continents were once connected in a single landmass.
Alfred Wegener used fossil evidence (matching plant and animal species across continents), geological evidence (similar rock formations and mountain ranges on different continents), climate evidence (glacial deposits and ancient climate patterns that suggested continents were once connected), and fit of continents (the way the continents seem to fit together like a puzzle) to support his hypothesis of continental drift.
Wegener used the presence of the same fossil species on continents that are now widely separated as evidence for his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these fossils could only have come from animals that were able to move, ruling out the possibility of passive transport by ocean currents. This supported his idea that the continents were once connected and later drifted apart.
Alfred Wegener gathered several pieces of evidence to support his continental drift hypothesis, including the fit of the continents, matching geological formations across different continents, similarities in fossil distributions, and paleoclimatic evidence such as glacial deposits and coal seams in regions that are now separated by oceans. These pieces of evidence suggested that the continents were once connected and have since drifted apart.
Wegener used similarities in fossil evidence and rock formations across different continents, along with past climatic evidence such as glacial deposits in regions where glaciers no longer exist, to support his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these geological and climatic similarities could only be explained by the continents once being connected in a single landmass.