Wegener used similarities in fossil evidence and rock formations across different continents, along with past climatic evidence such as glacial deposits in regions where glaciers no longer exist, to support his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these geological and climatic similarities could only be explained by the continents once being connected in a single landmass.
Alfred Wegener used climate to support his hypothesis of continental drift by noting that matching plant and animal fossils, as well as rock formations, across continents with similar past climates suggested that these landmasses were once connected. He argued that the distribution of certain geological features and fossils could only be explained by the movement of the continents over time.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Well it wasn't so much climate as the fossils that have been found. Fossils have been found in Antarctica of plants that only occur in tropical climates so at one point it must have had a tropical climate. That is the most dramatic example but there are more subtle ones that led him to believe that the continents, at one point, must have been in different locations on the Earth and then moved to where they currently are.
Alfred Wegener used several pieces of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of continents like South America and Africa, similar rock formations and mountain ranges across continents, and the distribution of plants and animals. He also looked at evidence from fossils and ancient climate data to support his hypothesis.
A continent close to the equator has a warm and mild climate. A continent far from the equator has a colder climate. Wegener found that continents now in a colder climates have evidence that they used to be in warmer climates, or vice versa. E.g. Wegener found that Spitsbergen, an island now in the Arctic Ocean, has fossils of tropical plants, plants that lived in warm places. Spitsbergen couldn't possibly be warm when it was in the Arctic Ocean, so according to Wegener, Spitsbergen must have been located near the equator about 300 million years ago.
hypothesis
well it wasn't so much climate as the fossils that have been found
He used fossils,climate changes,and landforms to support his theory.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Alfred Wegener used climate to support his hypothesis of continental drift by noting that matching plant and animal fossils, as well as rock formations, across continents with similar past climates suggested that these landmasses were once connected. He argued that the distribution of certain geological features and fossils could only be explained by the movement of the continents over time.
The ratio of the price of tea in China to the average density of the Moon. Among other things. You might want to be more specific in questions like this.
human remains
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Alfred Wegener used fossil evidence (matching plant and animal species across continents), geological evidence (similar rock formations and mountain ranges on different continents), climate evidence (glacial deposits and ancient climate patterns that suggested continents were once connected), and fit of continents (the way the continents seem to fit together like a puzzle) to support his hypothesis of continental drift.
Well it wasn't so much climate as the fossils that have been found. Fossils have been found in Antarctica of plants that only occur in tropical climates so at one point it must have had a tropical climate. That is the most dramatic example but there are more subtle ones that led him to believe that the continents, at one point, must have been in different locations on the Earth and then moved to where they currently are.
climate,fossils,geology
Alfred Wegener couldn't describe how the plate tectonics moved. So, scientists rejected his hypothesis.