Wegener used the presence of the same fossil species on continents that are now widely separated as evidence for his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these fossils could only have come from animals that were able to move, ruling out the possibility of passive transport by ocean currents. This supported his idea that the continents were once connected and later drifted apart.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Wegener used similarities in fossil evidence and rock formations across different continents, along with past climatic evidence such as glacial deposits in regions where glaciers no longer exist, to support his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these geological and climatic similarities could only be explained by the continents once being connected in a single landmass.
Alfred Wegener used fossil evidence, geological evidence, paleoclimatic evidence, and the fit of continental coastlines to support his theory of continental drift. By comparing fossils, rock formations, climate patterns, and the alignment of continents like puzzle pieces, Wegener proposed that the continents were once connected in a single supercontinent called Pangaea that drifted apart over time.
Fossil evidence such as the presence of identical plant and animal species on continents separated by oceans. This suggests that these continents were once connected and later drifted apart.
Alfred Wegener used fossil evidence, geological evidence, and paleoclimatic evidence to support his theory of Continental Drift. Fossils of the same species found on different continents, similar rock formations and mountain ranges across continents, and matching ancient climate patterns were key pieces of evidence that he presented.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Wegener used similarities in fossil evidence and rock formations across different continents, along with past climatic evidence such as glacial deposits in regions where glaciers no longer exist, to support his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these geological and climatic similarities could only be explained by the continents once being connected in a single landmass.
It is any trace of an ancient organism that has been preserved in rock.Fossils provided evidence for continental drift by Wegener's hypothesis. Wegener studied land features, fossils, and evidence of climate change.
The ratio of the price of tea in China to the average density of the Moon. Among other things. You might want to be more specific in questions like this.
Alfred Wegener used fossil evidence (matching plant and animal species across continents), geological evidence (similar rock formations and mountain ranges on different continents), climate evidence (glacial deposits and ancient climate patterns that suggested continents were once connected), and fit of continents (the way the continents seem to fit together like a puzzle) to support his hypothesis of continental drift.
Alfred Wegener used fossil evidence, geological evidence, paleoclimatic evidence, and the fit of continental coastlines to support his theory of continental drift. By comparing fossils, rock formations, climate patterns, and the alignment of continents like puzzle pieces, Wegener proposed that the continents were once connected in a single supercontinent called Pangaea that drifted apart over time.
Wegener's continental drift hypothesis was supported by several lines of evidence, including the fit of the continents, fossil correlations, and geological similarities across continents. For instance, the distribution of similar fossil species, such as Mesosaurus, found in both South America and Africa, suggested that these continents were once connected. Additionally, the alignment of mountain ranges and rock formations across continents indicated a shared geological history. These pieces of evidence collectively bolstered Wegener's argument for the movement of continents over time.
Alfred Wegener used various pieces of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of the continents, rock and fossil similarities across continents, glacial evidence, and similar geological features on different continents.
YES!!
Other scientists did not believe Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift in the early 20th century because he did not provide a plausible mechanism for how continents could move through the oceanic crust. Additionally, Wegener's evidence supporting his idea was largely based on geological and fossil similarities between continents, which were not considered strong enough to support such a revolutionary idea at the time. It wasn't until the mid-20th century, with the development of the theory of plate tectonics, that Wegener's hypothesis gained widespread acceptance.
Fossil evidence such as the presence of identical plant and animal species on continents separated by oceans. This suggests that these continents were once connected and later drifted apart.
Yes, fossil evidence such as similar plant and animal species found on separate continents has been used to support the continental drift hypothesis. The distribution of fossils across continents suggests that these land masses were once connected and later moved apart.