I have tried time and time again to figure it out but it is impossible.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Wegener used similarities in fossil evidence and rock formations across different continents, along with past climatic evidence such as glacial deposits in regions where glaciers no longer exist, to support his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these geological and climatic similarities could only be explained by the continents once being connected in a single landmass.
Alfred Wegener used deductive reasoning in developing his continental drift theory. He collected evidence from different fields such as geology, paleontology, and climatology to support his hypothesis that the continents were once connected in a single supercontinent called Pangaea.
Alfred Wegener used several pieces of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of continents like South America and Africa, similar rock formations and mountain ranges across continents, and the distribution of plants and animals. He also looked at evidence from fossils and ancient climate data to support his hypothesis.
Wegener used the presence of the same fossil species on continents that are now widely separated as evidence for his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these fossils could only have come from animals that were able to move, ruling out the possibility of passive transport by ocean currents. This supported his idea that the continents were once connected and later drifted apart.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
human remains
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was rejected because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how the continents moved. Additionally, the scientific community at the time did not have sufficient evidence to support the idea of continents drifting. It wasn't until the theory of plate tectonics emerged later, providing a mechanism and supporting evidence, that continental drift became widely accepted.
The ratio of the price of tea in China to the average density of the Moon. Among other things. You might want to be more specific in questions like this.
Alfred Wegener used fossil evidence (matching plant and animal species across continents), geological evidence (similar rock formations and mountain ranges on different continents), climate evidence (glacial deposits and ancient climate patterns that suggested continents were once connected), and fit of continents (the way the continents seem to fit together like a puzzle) to support his hypothesis of continental drift.
Alfred Wegener's proclamation of continental drift was initially considered a hypothesis because it lacked substantial empirical evidence to fully support it. A theory requires a well-established body of evidence and confirmed predictions, which were not present at the time of Wegener's proposal.
Wegener used similarities in fossil evidence and rock formations across different continents, along with past climatic evidence such as glacial deposits in regions where glaciers no longer exist, to support his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these geological and climatic similarities could only be explained by the continents once being connected in a single landmass.
Alfred Wegener used deductive reasoning in developing his continental drift theory. He collected evidence from different fields such as geology, paleontology, and climatology to support his hypothesis that the continents were once connected in a single supercontinent called Pangaea.
Alfred Wegener used several pieces of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of continents like South America and Africa, similar rock formations and mountain ranges across continents, and the distribution of plants and animals. He also looked at evidence from fossils and ancient climate data to support his hypothesis.
Wegener used the presence of the same fossil species on continents that are now widely separated as evidence for his hypothesis of continental drift. He argued that these fossils could only have come from animals that were able to move, ruling out the possibility of passive transport by ocean currents. This supported his idea that the continents were once connected and later drifted apart.