Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
His evidence was incorrect.
One day while scientists were exploring the sea floor, they discovered sea-floor spreading, thus proving Wegener's hypothesis to be correct.
dont ask me freak
There was no evidence to prove it
evidence supporting the idea of sea-floor spreading.
He could not provide a wholly acceptable explanation for the movement of the continents.
plate tectonics
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was largely rejected due to a lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move across the Earth's surface. He proposed that continents plowed through the oceanic crust, which seemed implausible to many scientists. Additionally, his ideas conflicted with the prevailing theories of the time, such as land bridges and static continents. The discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s eventually provided the necessary mechanisms for continental movement, validating Wegener's ideas long after their initial rejection.
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
Fossils support his hypothesis.
why did other scientist not accpet Alfred Wegeners theory