answersLogoWhite

0

Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was largely rejected due to a lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move across the Earth's surface. He proposed that continents plowed through the oceanic crust, which seemed implausible to many scientists. Additionally, his ideas conflicted with the prevailing theories of the time, such as land bridges and static continents. The discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s eventually provided the necessary mechanisms for continental movement, validating Wegener's ideas long after their initial rejection.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is next step if hypothesis is wrong that you formed?

Go back and check for flaws, and if you can't find any, form a new hypothesis.


What are flaws in the transparent globe hypothesis?

they are not smart


What are the flaws of medusa?

Turning people to stone


How can people hack?

By exploiting flaws in computer systems.


What does it mean to test a hypothesis?

A hypothesis is a fancy way of saying "guess". So to test a guess, you perform tests, or experiments, and make observations to see if this guess holds. If the experiments are sound (there are no flaws in the setup, you have accounted for all variables or things that can affect the results). And after collecting some data, perhaps repeating the experiment, you can see if the data supports the original hypothesis.


What are flaws in the transparent sphere hypothesis?

The transparent sphere hypothesis, which suggests that a transparent sphere could contain and manipulate light in a particular way, faces several flaws. Firstly, it overlooks the complexities of light behavior, such as refraction and reflection, which can lead to unexpected distortions rather than clear transmission. Additionally, the structural integrity and material properties required for such a sphere to maintain its shape while being transparent are not feasible with known materials. Lastly, the hypothesis may not adequately account for the interaction of light with external environments, which could diminish its effectiveness.


Why an experiment might not support a hypothesis even when the hypothesis is correct.?

An experiment might not support a hypothesis even when it is correct due to issues such as experimental design flaws, measurement errors, or uncontrolled variables that can introduce bias or noise. Additionally, the sample size may be too small to detect a true effect, leading to inconclusive results. Furthermore, the hypothesis may involve complex interactions that are not fully captured in the experimental setup, resulting in misleading conclusions.


What does enumerative mean?

This word means 1. to mention separately as if in counting; name one by one; specify, as in a list: Let me enumerate the many flaws in your hypothesis. 2. to ascertain the number of; count.


What are the flaws of nebular hypothesis?

The nebular hypothesis, which suggests that the solar system formed from a rotating cloud of gas and dust, has several flaws. One key issue is its inability to adequately explain the angular momentum distribution, as the planets and the sun have significantly different rotation rates. Additionally, it struggles to account for the formation of certain celestial bodies, like gas giants, and the observed irregularities in planetary orbits. Lastly, it does not fully address the mechanisms that led to the condensation of material into solid bodies.


Can people be perfect?

In my opinion, people can't be perfect. It may seem like they are perfect, but everyone has their flaws. :)


What do you do when your hypothesis is not supported?

When a hypothesis is not supported by the data, it's important to critically evaluate the research design, data collection methods, and analysis to identify any potential flaws or biases. This may lead to refining the hypothesis or formulating new ones based on the findings. It’s also valuable to review existing literature and consider alternative explanations for the results. Ultimately, this process contributes to the advancement of knowledge and can prompt further investigation.


What flaws did Aphrodite have?

She was cruel to some people. She also couldn't help making people fall in love with echother.