puzzle-like fit, climate, and animal traceings:))
Alfred Wegener proposed the hypothesis of continental drift, suggesting that the continents were once joined together in a single landmass called Pangaea. He proposed that the continents had drifted apart over time to their current positions. This idea laid the foundation for the theory of plate tectonics.
The hypothesis of an earthquake is that a sudden release of energy stored in Earth's crust causes seismic waves to propagate, resulting in ground shaking. This hypothesis is supported by observations of seismic activity, fault movements, and geological evidence.
The presence of the fossil fern Glossopteris supported Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift. Glossopteris fossils were found on multiple continents that are now widely separated, indicating that these landmasses were once connected and later drifted apart.
The main objection to Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Wegener's idea of continents plowing through solid oceanic crust was not supported by scientific knowledge at that time, leading many scientists to reject his hypothesis.
The hypothesis of the supercontinent Pangaea was not rejected, but rather supported by geological evidence such as matching rock formations, fossils, and mountain ranges across different continents. The concept of plate tectonics provided a framework to explain the breakup of Pangaea into separate continents over time.
The hypothesis you are looking for is continental drift.
Alfred Wegner's hypothesis about Pangea was that it is one whole big continent.
He discovered Pangaea; once all the continents were together, as one big continent.
Apex: conclusion
Ways a hypothesis can be supported is with pictures, explanations, or demostrate on the spot
Because wegner didnt have proof to show what caused mountains.
well if is not supported then is not a theory.
The degree to which a hypothesis is supported depends on the evidence available. If data and research findings align with the hypothesis and suggest a pattern or relationship, it can be considered supported. Further testing and analysis are often needed to strengthen the level of support for a hypothesis.
You write that the data supported your hypothesis.
This means the data supported the hypothesis.
Answer this question… What can a hypothesis become if it is supported by repeated experimentation?
If their data supported their hypothesis, then they would make a conclusion.