The hypothesis you are looking for is continental drift.
Alfred Wegner's hypothesis about Pangea was that it is one whole big continent.
He discovered Pangaea; once all the continents were together, as one big continent.
Because wegner didnt have proof to show what caused mountains.
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
because he couldn't explain what forces caused the continents to move... :D yup that's why
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
Alfred Wegener proposed the hypothesis of continental drift, suggesting that the continents were once joined together in a single landmass called Pangaea. He proposed that the continents had drifted apart over time to their current positions. This idea laid the foundation for the theory of plate tectonics.
The main problem with Wegners theory of continental drift was that at the time he proposed it he had no real proof.
wegners idea was icecream and then football practice
Somewhere in Euroasia....