The answer would be because Emily Barber loves Steven Disney forever and always. We can prove this because he is always looking at her boobs! BOOM!!!
Let's take the example of measuring the length of an object using two different tools: a ruler and a tape measure. The ruler has markings in millimeters, while the tape measure has markings in centimeters. If we use the ruler, we can read the measurement more precisely as we can estimate the length between the markings in millimeters. However, with the tape measure, we can only estimate the length between the centimeter markings, which is less precise. Therefore, the available tools have a direct impact on the precision of the measurement.
Both accuracy and precision are important to scientific measurement. I'll try to explain the difference with a couple of illustrations. I should start by saying, sometimes the words are used interchangeably but they shouldn't be. I consider precision to mean resolution. That is how fine/small a reading you can get.Assume an electronic thermometer (digital display) can display answers to the nearest one hundredth of a degree. But, the thermometer isn't able to measure with that accurately. Maybe it's only accurate to the nearest whole degree. In this case the precision is greater than is supported by the accuracy of the device.Now take the opposite case where the thermometer is able to measure temperature accurately to one hundredth of a degree but the instrument can only display whole degrees. In this case the precision does not support the accuracy.Ideally the accuracy and precision of an instrument are the same but often that's not the case.
just measure it in centimeters
Precision is a measure of how much tolerance your observation has. If you measure time in an experiment as 1.7 +/- .3 seconds, then you are saying that the obervation is anywhere from 1.4 seconds to 2.0 seconds. On the other hand, if you say 1.70 +/- .05 seconds, you state a range of 1.65 seconds to 1.75 seconds. The second observation is more precise than the first. Accuracy is a measure of how correct a measurement is as compared with a standard. If the instrument that measured 1.7 seconds was actually 1.6 seconds, then it would have an accuracy error of .1 seconds. Precision is related to random error. Accuracy is related to systematic error.
Example sentence - Our homework assignment is to give an example of thermal expansion and explain why it happens.
You need to answer this question because we don't do your homework and it is asking for your opinion and to show your critical thinking skills and how well you understood the the lesson.
the measurement is precise to within34.5.so,a measurement of 33.5 in could be 45or 49in
State and explain problems in measurement and evaluation
"http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Explain_with_example_how_charts_are_used_in_analysis_Also_explain_the_different_types_of_charts_available_in_Excel"
Both accuracy and precision are important to scientific measurement. I'll try to explain the difference with a couple of illustrations. I should start by saying, sometimes the words are used interchangeably but they shouldn't be. I consider precision to mean resolution. That is how fine/small a reading you can get.Assume an electronic thermometer (digital display) can display answers to the nearest one hundredth of a degree. But, the thermometer isn't able to measure with that accurately. Maybe it's only accurate to the nearest whole degree. In this case the precision is greater than is supported by the accuracy of the device.Now take the opposite case where the thermometer is able to measure temperature accurately to one hundredth of a degree but the instrument can only display whole degrees. In this case the precision does not support the accuracy.Ideally the accuracy and precision of an instrument are the same but often that's not the case.
i really do not know i just wanted to post that
You need to specify which country used the measurement.
A measurement that has a larger number of significant figures has a greater reproducibility, or precision because it has a smaller source of error in the estimated digit. A value with a greater number of significant figures is not necessarily more accurate than a measured value with less significant figures, only more precise. For example, a measured value of 1.5422 m was obtained using a more precise measuring tool, while a value of 1.2 m was obtained using a less precise measuring tool. If the actual value of the measured object was 1.19 m, the measurement obtained from the less precise measuring tool would be more accurate.
false.!!!I would have to disagree with this answer!! The member did not explain themselves!! I would have to say the answer is "TRUE"!!! Any feedback on this topic? Anyone care to respond, have discussion?I am also sure that the answer is true; see the link bellow.
Divide by 16.
to help with measurement that is related to the unit of measure
what do u mean by precipitation? explain by giving an example
What are conditional connectives? Explain use of conditional connectives with an example