0
WHAT ARE The two requirements that must be supported by a determination and finding (D and ampF) in the contract file to authorize an interagency acquisition under the Economy Act are that it is in th?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is ebt?
Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) is an electronic system that allows a recipient to authorize transfer of their government benefits from a Federal account to a retailer account to pay for products received.
What does monetize your YouTube videos mean?
Monetization means that you authorize the presence of advertisements on your videos, and YouTube charges advertisers for these and shares the fees with you, allowing you to make some money from people viewing your videos.
What is meant by overspending and unauthorised expenditure?
An organization must plan and authorize the money that it spends, also known as its expenditures. If the employees of an organization simply buy whatever they want to buy, without planning or authorization, then that organization will almost certainly run out of money and go bankrupt. Given unlimited opportunity to spend, most people are likely to spend too much. And even a very wealthy organization has only so much money to spend. So organizations make plans about how much they want to spend, and then to ensure that their employees will not violate those plans, they have only certain responsible people who are in charge of spending, who must give their agreement, in other words their authorization, before people can spend money. If there is more money spent than was planned, that is called overspending. And if money is spent without the authorization that an organization has asked for, then that is unauthorized expenditure. These things are certainly known to happen, and they endanger the finances of any organization in which they happen.
Would paying off every Americans mortgage solve the economic problem b c It would free up spending money create demand increase employment increase govt revenues help solve the deficit fix housing?
The biggest problem with your proposal is that the US government which is already drowning in debt and struggling to meet its existing financial obligations, does not have the trillions of dolllars that would be needed in order to pay off every American's mortgage, nor would it be feasible to borrow such a large amount even if Congress were to authorize that much of an increase in the legal debt ceiling (which they wouldn't); there is also another very serious problem which is that not all Americans have an unpaid mortgage (either because they have already paid off their mortgage, or because they don't own a home) so what you are proposing would give a huge benefit to some Americans, by paying off their mortgage, and no direct benefit to other Americans who don't have a mortgage, and this would seem to be very unfair; all Americans have equal rights under the law, and should all be treated equally. Huge gifts to some and no gifts to others would not seem to be fair. But there is no way to raise that much money anway. Of course, there are other options. The government could nationalize all housing. In the Soviet Union, the government owned all housing, assigned housing to everyone, and employed everyone, in an all-encompassing socialist state. However, it was also a hugely inefficient state which eventually collapsed. So that is not a very reliable solution either. I do think that we need to start looking for more radical solutions to our economic problems, but paying off everybody's mortgage would not seem to be the way to do it.
What happens when a nation is bankrupt?
Yes the international community was bankrupted in 1930 with its precedent in law Tompkins vs. Erie Railroad 1939. In order to bankrupt people, they were established as property with the previous case. Mr. Tompkins was declared a corporation that could not sue the Erie Railroad because he was not under contract with them. Hence, when Tompkins lost this case as of contracts law, people were then property not unlike slavery in history, but now it was official internationally. The real reason for this occurrence was that the Polity forgot the source and process of issuing sovereignty. So, what to do with the people? The choice had to be made and the gold was getting everyone in dutch as of countries plundering for gold attempting to control the currency. The rich families (Polity - Rothschild, Rockefeller, Brown et al) decided to pull the gold from the money-backing it and legalise the currency instead. In other words, the paper itself became the substance. Nothing wrong with that as long as everyone agreed. The problem remained that once people become aware of the fact that we are insolvent, few agree with it, but no one knows the answer overtly except The Brauch foundation (TBf). Their view is to introduce the Federal Reserve certificate (FRc) to the banks. Once the FRc is introduced cover huge blocks of money, profit certification takes place and solvency. It is very simple, if one comprehends the previous statement.For those of you who have any question, the one asking this question, and answering it, are the same person...and I think clearly an interesting, but absolute kook!I won't try to dispute too much of the absurdness above, but lets take a few main things:The word Bankruptcy defined: Insolvency; a process governed by federal law to help when people or entities cannot or will not pay their debts. The condition of being unable to pay one's debts as they become due.But the Governments of the World since 1930 (generally) have and are paying their debts.It is proper to notice that there is much difference between a bankrupt and an insolvent. A man may be a bankrupt, and yet be perfectly solvent; that is, eventually able to pay all his debts or, he may be insolvent, and, not be a bankrupt.The bankrupt laws are intended mainly to secure creditors from waste, extravagance, and mismanagement, by seizing the property out of the hands of the debtors, and placing it in the custody of the law; whereas the insolvent laws only relieve a man from imprisonment for debt after he has assigned his property for the benefit of his creditors. Both under bankrupt and insolvent laws the debtor is required to surrender his property, for the benefit of his creditors.Doesn't sound like anything that can even remotely said to apply to countries and governments since 1930 does it? And anyone should notice quickly...he claims US law cases had an effect on all the international governments in the world. That he would suggest that Germany, Italy, even France...(or any other country) just prior to WW2, in 1939, (or now) would care the least about some finding by some district of a US Court against a US railroad, should tell you a lot. Also note he claims the only ones that know all this is - The Brauch Foundation -. That, (if it exists anyplace other than this guys imagination), he says on his bio is something he originated! (Although it doesn't stop him from addressing it in the 3rd person). But considering so much of this site is otherwise droll, factual and non fiction, it makes for fun reading.
What Component procedures may authorize DoD GPC Ordering Officers to make purchases up to the Simplified Acquisition Threshold in cases?
at or below the micro purchase threshold from any vendor
Identifying the differences between the way you train and the way you plan to fight authorize us to do whatever is necessary to meet your wartime requirements?
FALSE
What part of speech is the word authorize?
The word "authorize" as in "to authorize" is a verb because it is an action.
What is a sentence using the word authorize?
He had to authorize the purchase that was made on his credit card. She had to sign a permission slip to authorize her son to go on the field trip. He refused to authorize the expenditure.
How can you use authorize in a sentence?
my aunt was act of the play call the killed man
Determines the degree to which a system complies with assigned IA controls based on validation results and then makes a certification determination to the DAA?
The Certification Authority is tasked with determining the degree to which a system complies with the assigned IA controls (based on validation results) and then provides the certification determination to the DAA. The DAA then makes a decision on whether to authorize the system for operation.
Component procedures may authorize DoD GPC Ordering Officers to make purchases up to the Simplified Acquisition Threshold in which of the following cases?
At the below the micro-purchase from any vendor
Finish the sentence hereby authorize?
I hereby authorize (name of a specific person), Attorney at Law, to be the Executor of my Will.I hereby authorize (name of a specific person) to withdraw $200 dollars from my bank account.
What is ratify?
To approve or authorize.
Who may authorize Security Forces Personnel to bear concealed firearms to meet certain mission requirements?
The authorities of the area being operated in, specifically that which deals with firearm regulation and operating under the laws of the area concerned.
What is the adverb for authorize?
There is no direct adverb form. The adverb forms of the participial adjectives (authorizedly and authorizingly) do not appear in dictionaries, nor does authorizably.
Accredit is to authorize and accomplished is to?
Proficient.
