Yes.
Well in my class i learned bonnie prince charlie fought for the Jacobites and their enemys were the hanovarians people call them the red coats.The jacobites and the red coats had a war and they fought a culloden battlefield. (the leader of the red coats was William of orange.)
Charles Edward Stuart (also known as Bonnie Prince Charlie and The Young Pretender) was the leader of the Jacobites.
Charles Edward Stuart better known as 'Bonnie Prince Charlie' and/or 'The Young Pretender'. None of 'Charlie's' senior officers believed that the ground at Culloden could be defended. Charles would not listen to them, he thought he knew better. The result ? Defeat for Charles's army.
No, he led his army into battle not thinking of the bad cause it would make.
Yes, the Duke of Cumberland was a far better leader than BPC. He trained his men well, enough to withstand the terrifying highland charge, while BPC was unexperienced, disagreed with his highland chiefs and led his men on an all night march to try and surprise the Hanoverians, which failed and the Jacobites had to turn back, the night before the battle, and were tired, hungry & cold. Furthermore, BPC let his men be fired upon for 10-30 minutes, letting them stand still in the face of cannon fire, before ordering them to charge across a boggy landscape. He even fled Culloden when he saw the battle was going badly. So, yes, whilst I prefered the Jacobites, BPC was a very poor leader.
Well in my class i learned bonnie prince charlie fought for the Jacobites and their enemys were the hanovarians people call them the red coats.The jacobites and the red coats had a war and they fought a culloden battlefield. (the leader of the red coats was William of orange.)
Charles Edward Stuart (also known as Bonnie Prince Charlie and The Young Pretender) was the leader of the Jacobites.
Charles Edward Stuart better known as 'Bonnie Prince Charlie' and/or 'The Young Pretender'. None of 'Charlie's' senior officers believed that the ground at Culloden could be defended. Charles would not listen to them, he thought he knew better. The result ? Defeat for Charles's army.
No, he led his army into battle not thinking of the bad cause it would make.
Yes, the Duke of Cumberland was a far better leader than BPC. He trained his men well, enough to withstand the terrifying highland charge, while BPC was unexperienced, disagreed with his highland chiefs and led his men on an all night march to try and surprise the Hanoverians, which failed and the Jacobites had to turn back, the night before the battle, and were tired, hungry & cold. Furthermore, BPC let his men be fired upon for 10-30 minutes, letting them stand still in the face of cannon fire, before ordering them to charge across a boggy landscape. He even fled Culloden when he saw the battle was going badly. So, yes, whilst I prefered the Jacobites, BPC was a very poor leader.
Ingrid Newkirk is the president and founder.
Charlie Scene
prince muedenew
Nasi (prince; president; leader) (Numbers 1:16).
Machiavelli
obama
Prince Karim Aga Khan