No.
At least a century later.
Thomas Becket was born on December 21, 1118.
Thomas Chaucer was born in 1367.
Thomas Becket was born in Cheapside, London around 1118
Thomas Becket was born on December 21, 1118.
Thomas Becket was Norman. Both his parents were actually born in Normandy. He, himself, was born in London.
He was born in 1118 cheapside, London
He was born in London (Cheapside to be exact).
Thomas Becket was born on December 21, 1118 and died on December 29, 1170. Thomas Becket would have been 52 years old at the time of death or 896 years old today.
December 21, 1118.
Thomas Becket was born in 1118, but we seem not to have any record of the exact date. His feast day is December 29, but this coincides with the date of his death.
He lived in England, was born in London, and was the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Thomas Becket was never called "Thomas a Becket" during his life, nor for many hundreds of years after his death. It is a later mistake and should be treated as such.He was born in England in 1118 of noble Norman parents; his father was Gilbert Becket, who was possibly sheriff of London. Thomas was most often called "Thomas of London" during the early part of his life.In Anglo-Norman French, the language he would have used among his own family, the word a can mean at, in, located in, on, against, around, to, as far as, towards. . . and many more prepositional meanings. If he had been Thomas a Becket, then the element Becket would have to be a place-name, in order for the a to make any sense.The problem is that there is not (and has never been) a place in England called Becket, so Thomas a Becket is not a sensible or feasible name for anyone to have.He was plain Thomas Becket and that is how he should be known everywhere today.