Was Chiang Kai-Shek a good military leader?

Was Chiang Kai shek a good leader?

noo he was not a good leader. he created alot of warss in china :((

What are the opinions about snowball?

snowball is a dedicated leader as well as a good military leader, later on in the story snowball is criticised of being a traitor by napoleon.

Which founding father served in the American revolution as a military leader?

Good old George Washington

What does military needs?

It needs Spirit, power, Men,I mean real Men,Technology,and a good leader . Good luck with your reaserch :)

What were the most important factors for success of an empire or dynasty?

Strong military, good government and leader, and power

Which political system has a supreme leader?

The term supreme leader is most likely to be used in a military dictatorship. Kim Jong Il of North Korea would be a good example of a supreme leader.

Good things about Saladin?

Saladin was an excellent leader, and he had an excellent understanding of military matters. He was also willing to negotiate with the enemy.

Did Paul in the Bible have good military leadership?

Paul in the Bible was never a military leader, although he probably had some useful skills, his poor eyesight may well have disqualified him.

Was Ulysses a good leader?

Ulysses S. Grant is often regarded as a good leader due to his strategic military acumen and ability to inspire his troops during the American Civil War. His determination and resilience were pivotal in securing key victories for the Union. However, his presidency faced challenges, including corruption scandals and economic turmoil, which complicate his legacy as a leader. Overall, while his military leadership was commendable, his effectiveness as a political leader remains debated.

Was sulla a good roman leader?

To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.

Why was Queen Elizabeth I a successful leader?

She was strong willed and didn't put up with any messing about in her court. She proved a woman could be a good military leader. She was quite pretty and had red hair.

How was balto a good leader?

no he is not a good leader