Mots laws are fair in punishment to the culprit. Once a person becomes a victim, there is not much anyone can do.
Yes, it shows significant gender and stature-related biases. Google Hammurabi's Code if you want a list of the laws.
yes they were fair becuse the pretected the peoople and punished the guilty. lake.
Type your answer here... Which best describes Babylonian law under Hammurabi?
The Hammurabi's code was not fair to everyone because if you hit a lower class person, you don't have to pay that much when you hit a upper class person. But, it was fair in some ways, that the punishments were so harsh that it would warn people not to do it.
The code of Kalatiaw is suspected of being a fake. Both codes attempt to carry fair and reasonable rules.
Yes because the Hammurabi was strict
they were fair cause they were
there were 282 laws made by hammurabi
Hammurabi was known for developing a wise and fair code of law.
Most historians think so.
His code of laws was fair to all classes of status and slaves.
Yes, social status did matter in Hammurabi's Code. The severity of punishments varied based on the social class of the offender and the victim. Higher classes were usually subject to lighter penalties compared to lower classes for the same crime.
Yes, it shows significant gender and stature-related biases. Google Hammurabi's Code if you want a list of the laws.
yes they were fair becuse the pretected the peoople and punished the guilty. lake.
Type your answer here... Which best describes Babylonian law under Hammurabi?
The Hammurabi's code was not fair to everyone because if you hit a lower class person, you don't have to pay that much when you hit a upper class person. But, it was fair in some ways, that the punishments were so harsh that it would warn people not to do it.
because his was more strict and it was not fair