0
No.
On October 3, 2005, President George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers, his private attorney and White House counsel, to the seat being vacated by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who was retiring.
Miers had no judicial experience, and was rated "unqualified" by the American Bar Association, which passes unofficial judgment on all Supreme Court nominees. The Republican party was outraged at the nomination and indicated they would not vote favorably for her appointment. Miers quietly requested her nomination be withdrawn before her Senate Judiciary hearing.
Ironically, one of Mier's most scathing critics was Robert Bork, the most recent nominee rejected by a vote of the Senate.
What else can I help you with?
Which US Supreme Court Justice retired in 2006 after 24 years of service?
Sandra Day O'Connor, who was commissioned in 1981 under President Ronald Regan, retired in 2006. She was replaced on the U.S. Supreme Court in 2006 by Samuel Alito, after the failed nomination of Harriet Miers.
What Supreme Court appointments did George W. Bush make?
President George W. Bush nominated John G. Roberts, Jr to serve as Chief Justice, and Samuel Alito, Jr to serve as an Associate Justice. Both of those nominations were confirmed by the Senate.(Previously, President Bush nominated Harriet Miers to serve as an Associate Justice. However, Harriet Miers was forced to withdraw her name from consideration due to the general consensus that she lacked the qualifications necessary for an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court.To view a list of all past and present members of the Supreme Court in a pdf file, click on the link to the US Supreme Court's website under Related Links below.
What is the birth name of Harriet Miers?
Harriet Miers's birth name is Harriet Ellan Miers.
What is Harriet Miers's birthday?
Harriet Miers was born on August 10, 1945.
When was Harriet Miers born?
Harriet Miers was born on August 10, 1945.
What is Harriet Miers' relationship to the US Supreme Court?
AnswerHarriet Miers was nominee to the US Supreme Court for a brief period in 2005, but her nomination was withdrawn when it became clear she was considered unqualified.ExplanationOn October 3, 2005, President George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers, his private attorney and White House counsel, to the seat being vacated by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who was retiring.Miers had no judicial experience, and was rated "unqualified" by the American Bar Association, which passes unofficial judgment on all Supreme Court nominees. The Republican party was outraged at the nomination and indicated they would not vote favorably for her appointment. Miers quietly requested her nomination be withdrawn before her Senate Judiciary hearing.Ironically, one of Mier's most scathing critics was Robert Bork, the most recent nominee rejected by a vote of the Senate.
Who were President George W Bush's two US Supreme Court appointees?
President George W. Bush nominated John G. Roberts, Jr to serve as Chief Justice, and Samuel Alito, Jr to serve as an Associate Justice. Both of those nominations were confirmed by the Senate. Previously, President Bush nominated Harriet Miers to serve as an Associate Justice. However, Harriet Miers was forced to withdraw her name from consideration due to the general consensus that she lacked the qualifications necessary for an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court.Chief Justice Roberts was confirmed by a Senate vote of 78-22 on September 29, 2005; Justice Alito was confirmed by a vote of 58-42 on January 31, 2006.To view a list of all past and present members of the Supreme Court in a pdf file, feel free to click on the link to the US Supreme Court's website under Related Links below.
How old is Harriet Miers?
Harriet Miers is 68 years old (birthdate: August 10, 1945).
What Supreme Court nominee withdrew her name from consideration in 2005?
Harriet MiersOn October 3, 2005, President George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers, his private attorney and White House counsel, to the seat being vacated by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who was retiring.Miers had no judicial experience, and was rated "unqualified" by the American Bar Association, which passes unofficial judgment on all Supreme Court nominees. The Republican party was outraged at the nomination and indicated they would not vote favorably for her appointment. Miers quietly requested her nomination be withdrawn before her Senate Judiciary hearing.Ironically, one of Mier's most scathing critics was Robert Bork, the most recent nominee rejected by a vote of the Senate.
Was Robert Bork the only person ever nominated by the President to serve on the Supreme Court who was not confirmed by the Senate?
No there have been some 36 , some of whom were later confirmed, The most recent was Harriet Miers, nominated by George W. Bush. See the related link if you want to know more.
What religion is Harriet Miers?
As a child, Harriet Miers attended services at Presbyterian, Episcopalian and Catholic churches. As an adult, she joined the Valley View Christian Church, a non-denominational protestant Christian church in the Stone-Campbell or Restoration Movement tradition. The church is generally classified as theologically and morally conservative and evangelical.
Do you have to be a resident to become a member of the supreme court?
You don't have to be a resident...or a citizen...a graduate of America's finest law school...a sitting judge...or even attended college to be a Justice on the Supreme Court. The only requirement, according to the Constitution, for a person to take a seat on the Supreme Court that person must be nominated by the president and approved by the Senate. That's it! George W. Bush wanted to seat Harriet Miers, who'd never been a judge but was a lawyer. The Senate reported they were planning to not approve her because she'd never been a judge...but if a hog farmer or a diesel mechanic who never graduated from high school (a couple of Justices in the 19th century were high school dropouts who learned the law from reading books, so it's possible) could prove they had the greatest legal mind of all time to the satisfaction of the president and the Senate, the Supreme Court would seat that person.In today's legal environment that wouldn't happen because America has enough sitting judges they don't need to look outside their ranks for new Supreme Court Justices, but there's no law that says they can't still do it.
