yes
In terms of area and population, the Roman Empire at its height was much larger, but it must be remembered that it took the Romans many generations to build their empire, while Alexander built his in only a few years. Macedonia later became a Roman privince, but several Eastern provinces of the former Macedonian Empire were never added to the Roman Empire.
The Maurya Empire was larger.
Gupta empire was larger than mauryan empire.
Empire.
Alexander the Great's empire did not grow any larger primarily due to the exhaustion of his troops and logistical challenges. After years of relentless campaigning, his soldiers, weary from constant battles and long marches, refused to march further into India at the Hyphasis River. Additionally, the vast territories already conquered presented significant challenges in governance and integration, making further expansion difficult. Ultimately, Alexander's early death in 323 BCE also curtailed any further ambitions for expansion.
The Greeks did not have an empire,
The Maurya Empire was larger.
The Mauryan Empire is the largest
The Mauryan Empire was larger than the Gupta Empire.
The Mauryan Empire was larger than the Gupta Empire.
The British Empire was way larger and was way closer to today than the Roman Empire.
An Empire is usually a large number of kingdoms ruled over by one conquering kingdom or nation, and therefore an empire would usually have a much larger population