There have been several 'deathbed confessions' , the most famous being from James Maybrick. In the 1970s a journal turned up labeled Jack The Ripper's Diary. It was proven to have come from the Victorian Age, the Ripper's time, and many believe it was written by Maybrick. That's not the problem though. Maybrick claimed to be the Ripper but has to be ruled out. He was not even availabe for several of the murders.
Maybrick was a English businessman and was also an arsenic addict. He was well into his 50s at the time of the murders and had many health problems, mostly due to his addiction.
Arsenic poisoning causes numbness and weakness and the Ripper crimes called for a younger killer, and most definitely a stronger one. Maybrick may have been an addict but he was not Jack The Ripper.
All other 'confessions' have proven to be false, and so we still must wonder exactly who the Ripper truly was.
He's not. Jack The Ripper was never identified.
Jack The Ripper was never identified or caught.
They have not identified who Jack the ripper was and therefore no one can tell you if the offender had any family
Jack the Ripper was never identified, altho his crimes occurred in London.
As 'Jack' was never identified, no one knows.
As 'Jack' wasnever caught or identified no one knows
As 'Jack' has never been identified the question is impossible to answer.
As 'Jack' was never identified it is not known where he lived
Since Jack has never been identified, it is rather difficult to attempt an answer.
That is unknown because it is not known for sure who Jack the Ripper was. The question of his profile is still asked today.
The 19th century serial killer named Jack The Ripper was never identified. It would be impossible to know if he was an only child or not.
He was never identified or caught so his birthdate remains a mystery.