Yes, because back then he was President of Congress.
He signed the Declaration of Independence and was our temporary leader before the war ended.
He too part in the revolution war I think
He did not so much as play a great part in the American revolution, but what he did was sign his signature so large on the Declaration of Independence that the King wouldn't need his glasses to read it; a move widely considered popular at the time.
John Hancock was born on January 23, 1737; according to the Old Style calendar then in use, the date was January 12, 1736. His birthplace was Braintree, Massachusetts, in a part of town which eventually became the separate city of Quincy. He was the son of the Reverend John Hancock of Braintree and Mary Hawke Thaxter, who was from nearby Hingham.John Hancock's father was a Congregationalist minister who died when Hancock was 7. He was adopted by his paternal uncle Thomas Hancock.
American colonists seeking independence ... American loyalists seeking to remain part of the British empire ... Irish soldiers fighting in the British Army ... poor seamen pressed into service in the British Navy ... German mercenaries hired by the British ... French volunteers for the American side ... etc., etc.
No. He was an English philosopher and not part of the American revolution . Jefferson just used his thinking in his writings.
If fact he did. He gained of gained the presidency of the congress.
no
The northeastern part of the colonies was the main hotbed of anti English sentiment. People like John and Sam Adams were from Massachusetts.
she sewed the American Flag
Texas played no part at all in the American Revolution; at that time it was a part of the Spanish colony of Mexico.
no