I think whether Edward I was good or bad would depend on who you ask. Clearly there were Scots, Welsh, and Jews who had reason to despise him, and some of his own subjects felt the same way. But he seems to have worked toward a better constitution for the government and better laws; some people admire that.
Depends on who you are. The Welsh and Scots view him as a ruthless invader. Others might view him as the layer of foundations of the UK. Whether that's good thing or not depends on your view of history.
no because it would of sayed it
A bad king
He was average.
King Edward 1 gave nearly all his power to the commoners ...
King Edward 1 gave nearly all his power to the commoners ...
he's very bad
Edward VI was a bad king because he was very young when he took to the throne so he might not have known things that the older kings or queens knew. Also he was a very weak, sickly child who was ill a lot of the time. He also had a savage temper.
His reign is known for its peaceful nature. But his succession issue led the the invasion of the Normans in 1066.
Edward VI was a bad king because he was very young when he took to the throne so he might not have known things that the older kings or queens knew. Also he was a very weak, sickly child who was ill a lot of the time. He also had a savage temper.
No, he's just a human. But his manners are very terrible so he was called as 'devil'. That's it.
a bad king
yes he was.
because he didnt do what he needed to do as a orginal king will.