i have no idea!!
i think he was a bad leader coz all he cared about was the money he had got from royalty
King George Was A Bad Leader Because He Dident Let Any Slaves Celabrate Any Holidays.BAD RIGHT?
well he was a good leader but he was mean to the poor people and would not help them adjectives he was mean bad leader wise.
Henry V was a good king because he beat the french in the battle of Agincourt, he was a good military leader and he delt with rebels. He was a bad king because as a young man he spent most of his time in pubs and brothels
Yes he was because he gave the poor money and he did good things for his country but at the same time he was kinda bad because he took away the colonists and patriots human rights. Overall, he was an average king in my opinion. I hope this helps!
he was a really bad king. You can see on http://cbbc.co.uk/horriblehistories/clips/born2rule/
he was a bad soldier because he was a bad leader and showed the path of the other people the wrong side .
No, he was a good leader who sometimes did bad things.
a bad king
both
King George
King George II gave James Oglethorpe the Charter to even create Ga,so we paid debt to him..We would probably have names the state after Oglethorpe but evidently he was a bad leader and he left us too go back to England.☺︎
Good King Bad was created on 8-07-09.